SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
GateField (GATE)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4005 15 0 GATE
Emcee:  Chi Jones Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2280 Hope you are right-market is as usual rough and getting rougher-gate is doing wjm-1/9/1998
2279 I would like to see $8-9 share this year. I'm optimistic. Just my opinion.rR Petersen-1/9/1998
2278 R Petersen Nice start out of the GATE today. Lets hope its a stDouglas Raushel-1/9/1998
2277 It's been doing well in a terrible down market though! At least its reversiR Petersen-1/9/1998
2276 Dear Petersen: I was just teasing you. Personally, just because of the playerJDN-1/9/1998
2275 Kelly, I haven't seen anything from you on the Gate thread for some- time. Michael Greeley-1/8/1998
2274 Any input is appreciated, positive though.R Petersen-1/8/1998
2273 Dear R. Petersen: Well, which do you want REALISTIC or OPIMISTIC! JDNJDN-1/8/1998
2272 Are there any realistic or optimistic ideas on the price in say in the next 3-7R Petersen-1/8/1998
2271 Zeev: So far with todays price action, I think GATE may notch up to 1.75 rangeHARVEY G. KOEDYKER-1/8/1998
2270 Judd: You're hypothesis may very well be correct -- that GATE's beta ilml-1/7/1998
2269 Zeev; Would you agree that GATE's beta is not that correlated to the marketJudd C. Lee-1/7/1998
2268 Judd, maybe I should have added to my reasoning, I think that the market for teZeev Hed-1/6/1998
2267 Bruce, just be careful about ALMI, they have just undergone another massive finZeev Hed-1/6/1998
2266 Zeev Well this is the second time I'm writing in support of what you did. Bruce H. Becker-1/6/1998
2265 Zeev Welcome back. I have accepted, or found plausible, your comments in the Judd C. Lee-1/6/1998
2264 Harvey, I do not think the technicals of GATE are good right now, and I actuallZeev Hed-1/6/1998
2263 To all: The Gatefield web page works fine now. gatefield.comMilt Best-1/6/1998
2262 Zeev: What do you think about the technicals right here. Have been having a haHARVEY G. KOEDYKER-1/5/1998
2261 Slob, it sounds as if you have been through the wringer before. I have explaineZeev Hed-1/5/1998
2260 Zeev, Welcome back. Most canned Si posters need to start a new account witslob-1/5/1998
2259 This isn't news its an advertisement. Not complaining, I'm glad to seeFollies-1/5/1998
2258 News on PRNEWSWIRE!!!!!R Petersen-1/5/1998
2257 I agree. Get their phone # off of their web site and make your opinions known. R Petersen-1/2/1998
2256 I'm having the same problem. I thought it was just me.Milt Best-1/2/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):