SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
SWS - An undiscovered gem
An SI Board Since January 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
504 11 0 SWS
Emcee:  CRay33 Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
229 Did we each get a 1 for 10 last week? What are the details of that?? dates etmfgrep-5/20/1999
228 Got a few more on the dip to 76. The 10 percent dividend is worth more as the John Chapman-5/20/1999
227 I'm curious too. Perhaps he misunderstood me Kevin. I TOOK profits at $81mfgrep-5/20/1999
226 Why would you want to take profits on a dip? If you think the price will dip &Kevin McKenzie-5/20/1999
225 If the temptation of taking profits off the table is too great to you, go aheaLennart Steiner-5/20/1999
224 <devil's advocate here> Seems awfully fast to me!....I wouldn't mfgrep-5/20/1999
223 all of the internet brokers are absurdly priced..this one can get to 13B and sBonnie Bear-5/20/1999
222 Do you think the stock might be ahead of itself here? Seems to be moving prettrogermci®-5/19/1999
221 There are various Putnam funds. I wonder if this analyst works at this same mutRita-5/19/1999
220 DJ Southwest Securities Up Again After Putnam Lovell Note NEW YORK (Dow JoneWilliam F. Wager, Jr.-5/19/1999
219 Opps, I meant to say 1 for 10. 10 for 1, in my dream. thanks. RitaRita-5/19/1999
218 It's an 11 for 10 split, not a 10 for 1 split. Owners will receive 1 shareKevin McKenzie-5/19/1999
217 We know for a fact that there is a 10 to 1 "split". :-) It is fine eRita-5/19/1999
216 OK....don't mean to start any rumor ;-) Just speculating. Frank Drumond-5/19/1999
215 Frank, just to keep the record straight: It was not me who started the rumor oLennart Steiner-5/19/1999
214 > I bought SWS in the $ 29.00 - $ 30.00 and will stay at least until after tFrank Drumond-5/19/1999
213 Frank, I fully agree with you. I, too sold my EGRP on 1/4/99 and 1/21/99 @ $ 2Lennart Steiner-5/19/1999
212 I understand...been tempted to sell myself as I bought in December at 22....butFrank Drumond-5/19/1999
211 I think we have to rename this thread "SWS...a Discovered gem"!!! Womfgrep-5/19/1999
210 I have no idea...but WOW!!!!! Jason mfgrep-5/19/1999
209 SWS is smoking this morning. The thing that amazes me is the strong upward movFrank Drumond-5/19/1999
208 HI with any luck this trend should continue. i have sch, sws and many blue chmary bart-5/18/1999
207 Looks like an excellent close....digested the Fed news very happily Frank Drumond-5/18/1999
206 Southwest Securities Group Rated New 'Buy' at Putnam,Lovell William F. Wager, Jr.-5/18/1999
205 I don't know. The paper could be wrong. The article says 523 billion. It alJohn Chapman-5/18/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News