SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Intermagnetics (IMG)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3448 16 0 IMG
Emcee:  Gregg Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2298 Intermagnetics General Corporation Shareholders Approve Increase In Shares Authrustyjack-11/17/1997
2297 And if I'm not mistaken you were the person liking Cryo-tech or whatever thGerald Thomas-11/17/1997
2296 I have read the news release through 4 different sources so far and this facilGerald Thomas-11/17/1997
2295 <<It would be great if this facility is to be partially used for the chipDavid B.-11/17/1997
2294 It would be great if this facility is to be partially used for the chip-coolingMark Shaw-11/17/1997
2293 Looks like IBM is sinking a lot of money into advanced chips... good news for tGerald Thomas-11/17/1997
2292 I don't blame you... The only thing I can say is that I think the best way Gerald Thomas-11/15/1997
2291 The only problem I have with cryoelectronics is that it too appears to only be Mark Shaw-11/15/1997
2290 You may be right about de-emphasizing frigc or at least seasonally de-emphasiziGerald Thomas-11/14/1997
2289 Unfortunately Steve, he can still find 30# loads. I think there are less than 2Mark Shaw-11/14/1997
2288 My local paper carries the weather for Sydney, Australia and yesterday it said Steve in Vegas-11/14/1997
2287 I don't know what you're talking about, Gerald. IMG should be going ganMark Shaw-11/13/1997
2286 Amazingly enough short term I am much more positive on PJTV because there is soGerald Thomas-11/13/1997
2285 Gerald - Glad I could bring a smile to your face. Now if we can just do sometGreg Werlinich-11/13/1997
2284 Steve - The ULBI drop had nothing to do with IMG. There was a bulls..t articlGreg Werlinich-11/13/1997
2283 Mark - I certainly agree with you about that. I mentioned that to Glenn EpsteGreg Werlinich-11/13/1997
2282 OK Mark, you are crazy. (-: I should know. I'm the craziest one here.Mark Shaw-11/13/1997
2281 IMG looks like it might have a future. I've been thinking of selling some SMark A. Forte-11/13/1997
2280 I hope you are right. I'm not going to sell anything here. The price is tooMark Shaw-11/12/1997
2279 Yeah but the R&D expenses (which we already knew about) are lower than the Gerald Thomas-11/12/1997
2278 Gerald: I wish I shared your optimism. I think that the increased R&D and Mark Shaw-11/12/1997
2277 Mark I already did that ... I would recomend looking at options especially afteGerald Thomas-11/12/1997
2276 Greg... Excellent report!!! I feel good about the amount of good things reporGerald Thomas-11/12/1997
2275 Greg - thank you for the excellent report. BTW, I noticed that ULBI dropped 2 1Steve in Vegas-11/12/1997
2274 Greg: One more comment on the annual meeting. I think it is ridiculous to be Mark Shaw-11/12/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):