SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Applied Micro Circuits Corp (AMCC)
An SI Board Since November 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1805 111 0 AMCC
Emcee:  Dave Grady Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
230 It's a good strategy, however I don't like to personally short these coSJS-10/19/1999
229 The chart looks pretty bad. It may not go that low but it seems like a reasonabBill Hardison-10/19/1999
228 Bill, Honestly, I don't think it's going that low. However, that'SJS-10/19/1999
227 Based on how bad the chart looks I'm targeting around 44 to cover.Bill Hardison-10/19/1999
226 Good advice, I'm sure. As I said though, I'm just short a few selected Bill Hardison-10/19/1999
225 Thank "the guy upstairs" for you shorters. If it wasn't for you,SJS-10/18/1999
224 Thanks for the analysis. Actually I'm short this one. Nothing really againsBill Hardison-10/18/1999
223 Great post, We are in a once in a century complete replacement of the global cTrader Dave-10/18/1999
222 Bill, If you haven't noticed, these are pretty crazy times <g>. TheSJS-10/17/1999
221 Retracement to the 50dma so the bigboys could get in cheap again.xcr600-10/17/1999
220 ...but AMCC sold off on the day they released the earnings. I was thinking maybBill Hardison-10/16/1999
219 Bill, Good earnings the day before, and the general rebound in all the chippieSJS-10/16/1999
218 Was there some news I didn't see that moved AMCC up so much against a down Bill Hardison-10/16/1999
217 <i>>God forbid they report an </i>in-line<i> quarter!</Beltropolis Boy-10/15/1999
216 <i>>No I did not notice that because quite frankly, and with all due rBeltropolis Boy-10/14/1999
215 Yes, agree with you on the long bond. I've been watching it this morning aKayaker-10/14/1999
214 Nice trade. You're up a point. Maybe this is the level that stocks are coSJS-10/14/1999
213 <i>I agree with you. However, it is.</i> It sure is... er, was. IKayaker-10/14/1999
212 My problem is that I just bought TXCC for a trade, and now it has become a &quoSJS-10/14/1999
211 Ah, playing sword catcher. I was checking out the cisco chart this morning sinTrader Dave-10/14/1999
210 I agree with you. However, it is. People are not thinking about growth rates,SJS-10/14/1999
209 With their growth rate, hard to believe AMCC will go too much lower. Sure is tKayaker-10/14/1999
208 Chris, I am salivating at the perceived "low price" of AMCC, but I tSJS-10/14/1999
207 count me in! man i love the GTC order. (well, "good til 60 days" noBeltropolis Boy-10/14/1999
206 God forbid they report an <i>in-line</i> quarter! I guess the demaTrader Dave-10/14/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):