SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
PLAYFAIR MINING - PLY . V
An SI Board Since May 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
505 11 0 PLY
Emcee:  Brumell Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
230I have no idea, Claude. I got the impression they were going there anyway and thBrumell-7/23/2001
229BTW Bob, Why is PLY going to Sudbury ? Are they meeting with some personel of Claude Cormier-7/23/2001
228Some thing else of interest Claude. You can listen to Briggs being interviewedBrumell-7/20/2001
227You will get it Claude.... accurate and unvarnished :-)Brumell-7/20/2001
226Bob, OK... I nominate you our official reporter. We expect your analysis on ThuClaude Cormier-7/20/2001
225IMPORTANT NOTE Playfair are doing a presentation in Sudbury next Wednesday at 7Brumell-7/20/2001
224That's a good post Liz. You've summed it up - the dilemma facing exploraBrumell-7/20/2001
223To be sure they have several options. They could convince a major to take down russet-7/20/2001
222I don't think that, generally, what you have proposed is the correct way of Elizabeth Andrews-7/20/2001
221Hi Lizzy,... Surely insiders haven't finished yet,...they must be thinking russet-7/19/2001
220I meant after the first drill hole especially if it turns out to be the discoverElizabeth Andrews-7/19/2001
219The mineralization will be visible and the people who see it will be virtual in Elizabeth Andrews-7/19/2001
218Cheaper than the $10 million? Oh, that was just to get into space, wasn't itElizabeth Andrews-7/19/2001
217LOL Claude. I think so! GJust G-7/19/2001
216G, It seems that we all agree on this thread... Something must be wrong --:))Claude Cormier-7/19/2001
215That's an excellent report by Mosher. It's no quick sales job. There'Brumell-7/19/2001
214Claude: Likewise. I want to see this drilled. But, like you, I want to Just G-7/19/2001
213Interesting indeed... the recommendation is to drill E-1N...while the company isClaude Cormier-7/19/2001
212I noticed that Ply's independant geologist's report is now posted on theJust G-7/19/2001
211Hi Claude: The way that Mr. Briggs spoke is the way of your thinking, Just G-7/19/2001
210<Considering anomalies are a couple hundred meters wide at high points, yet aClaude Cormier-7/19/2001
209<I'm waiting for a drill program and a hole with mineralization in it. &gClaude Cormier-7/19/2001
208Tom, My position since the beginning has been that these anomalies are a great Claude Cormier-7/19/2001
207Doubt they could keep things quiet, JP. Site is too accessible. Considering anBrumell-7/19/2001
206>>> During these early stage programs, I have found that I usually get Brumell-7/19/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News