SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Juniper Networks - JNPR
An SI Board Since April 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3350 234 0 JNPR
Emcee:  Michael Wilson Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2325<i>However, using your numbers, JNPR is even more undervalued and thereforBruce Brown-4/3/2001
2324What makes you so sure that jnpr will make it's numbers when no one else is?Wes Stevens-4/3/2001
2323You are correct. Yahoo's research page apparently is using an out-of-date stRobert T. Quasius-4/3/2001
2322Thanks for the info... I am looking to reenter JNPR ....Looking for $25 or so..Rich1-4/3/2001
2321Curious how you compute the estimated P/E for Juniper at 50 based on a stock priBruce Brown-4/3/2001
2320P/E based upon this years consensus numbers is 50, with a consensus long term grRobert T. Quasius-4/2/2001
2319pE still 89 times..Rich1-4/2/2001
2318People (posters) are speaking about price/book ratio for all networking stocks, Scott Bergquist-4/2/2001
2317Book value doesn't mean much for a technology company, or for many other typRobert T. Quasius-4/2/2001
2316The book value of this stock is under $5.00. You hear a lot of talk these last Scott Bergquist-4/2/2001
2315How much lower can JNPR go? What if they warn, can this hit the teens? Vinniebvinnieb-4/2/2001
2314Yes forward guidance is everything, would love to see them raise their targets aneverenough-3/31/2001
2313Bongagong, For them to warn, wouldn't that have to have happened already? IfStephen M. DeMoss-3/31/2001
2312My technical indicators went positive on the naz last week, so I expect a rally.neverenough-3/31/2001
2311Believe Barron's interview piece in this mornings paper was positive on jnprJohn Carragher-3/31/2001
2310Bongabong, Anyone bullish these days re: Jnpr? It has been on my buy list for a Stephen M. DeMoss-3/31/2001
2309ever heard of AMT (alternative minimum tax)?pass pass-3/29/2001
2308I think there will be more tax selling then you think. The fact that it was not Wes Stevens-3/29/2001
2307Charlie, I think the Nazdaq is falling is due to poor business outlook. Tax seBo Le-3/29/2001
2306Epoch Initiates Juniper Coverage ----------------------------------------------neverenough-3/28/2001
2305Bo After today I think you have a point. How much of all this do you think is rCharlie Schultz-3/28/2001
2304Note the Robertson Stephens comment today on CSCO has JNPR written all over it. Herschel Rubin-3/28/2001
2303The Nazdaq will bottom out when ... JNPR and CIEN to issue warning. I believe tBo Le-3/28/2001
2302I find it hard to believe that anyone shorting the Nasdaq techs/internet is too cyberman-3/16/2001
2301<i>That is one strategy, another is to short this one down to the 25-30 razbyslaw owczarczyk-3/15/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News