SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Biotech Stock Picking - 2003
An SI Board Since December 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
383 38 0
Emcee:  michael_f_murphy Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
233While everyone else was cowering in the face of Harmon's arrogant and disgusscott_jiminez-5/20/2003
232<< I'm sure you have fine qualities that would allow us to forgive youscott_jiminez-5/19/2003
231Scott, I'm not sure that I believe in God, but I'll never be an atheist.The Dodgy Ticker-5/19/2003
230Obviously, we must also forgive many of our other colleagues who feel that if evscott_jiminez-5/19/2003
229Cher izona, This thread is for commentary on a biotechnology stock-picking contJohn Metcalf-5/19/2003
228And where oh where is ole sanctimonious Mr. Murphy - our gatekeeper of civilizatscott_jiminez-5/18/2003
227Please get some help.Elmer-5/18/2003
226What's your point, asshole? (and if you have a problem with the 'tone&#scott_jiminez-5/18/2003
225Scott, Just let it go. No one wants to hear it.Elmer-5/18/2003
224Your unfortunate lack of tact and irresponsible promotion of companies, stocks, scott_jiminez-5/18/2003
223Some feel civility is not due to off topic touters. Try reading the header befotuck-5/17/2003
222What ever happened to civility on SI? Richard, may I suggest you read the 22 pagArizona997-5/17/2003
221Richard, Tell us how you really feel. :-)Elmer-5/16/2003
220AVXSF is an emerging biotech company that uses nano particles to deliver cancer Arizona997-5/16/2003
219Today my entries are up to about 53%--but that is still a few percent behind theMike McFarland-5/15/2003
218I updated my portfolio to reflect the completion of the SCIO take over at $45 onJoan Osland Graffius-5/14/2003
217This is a tough group. I'm up 31% for the first 1/3 of the year and I'm Baton-5/13/2003
216>>Michael didn't want to bother with<< Now that we have worked michael_f_murphy-5/12/2003
215Of course the gaming part of it is pretty fun (we wouldn't have many takers Mike McFarland-5/10/2003
214John, does that other 100% consist of "dark matter" in Erik's portThe Dodgy Ticker-5/10/2003
213What a difference a year makes. Last year, Julius and Rick managed to lose a liJohn Metcalf-5/10/2003
212parking calculation: 8,264 OGSI @ $2.86 = $23635.04 / 7 = $3376.43 per stock AMtuck-5/9/2003
211There was consensus - Message 18843676 (and following posts...) The only variatinigel bates-5/9/2003
210Did we get consensus on the distribution of OGSI funds? When and how? Looking tuck-5/9/2003
209OT: One of my 2003 picks is up over 100% and the following explains why other arArthur Radley-5/2/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News