SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
42835 221 0
Emcee:  wooden ships Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
23362Excellent, ms queen. With all due credit and respect for our lounge-sitting MHoney_Bee-8/9/2006
23361<i>I don't care to spend the time to actually document...</i> Oqueenleah-8/9/2006
23360TRUTH HOMER!!! :)Honey_Bee-8/9/2006
23359From: etymonline.com capiche 1940s slang, from It. capisci? "do you undersEQ -8/9/2006
23358" Capisce From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia" I'll bet you spestockalot-8/9/2006
23357I don't care to spend the time to actually document the length of time that Honey_Bee-8/9/2006
23356"half a day"? Honey, can you document that? Or is that just another miqueenleah-8/9/2006
23355I could care less if you are or are not friends with allancoleman. And I certainHoney_Bee-8/9/2006
23354ROFLOL! I looked that up to, but decided to let the queen go on living in her tHoney_Bee-8/9/2006
23353Honey you are quite perceptive.stockalot-8/9/2006
23352maybe, maybe not. You made friends with a nasty person who openly attacked me aKirk ©-8/9/2006
23351I don't recall saying he was a "bad person." I'm just saying tHoney_Bee-8/9/2006
23350c-a-p-i-s-c-e: Computer Architecture for Production Information Systems in a CoEQ -8/9/2006
23349I can only make so many requests... I have no idea why he writes that way... butKirk ©-8/9/2006
23348nope . you are wrong . you have treated allancoleman with kid gloves . liHoney_Bee-8/9/2006
23347Kirk pleads for spam links.... "Please post a link back to that original pshres-8/9/2006
23346<b>c-a-p-i-s-c-e</b> Thank you for caring. :o)queenleah-8/9/2006
23345Oh, I've probably given him about as much as he's given me. You and I hKirk ©-8/9/2006
23344Stockalot, wondersaloud.... "Can anyone tell me which of Bob's calls wshres-8/9/2006
23343My goodness. The Brinkerbashers are out in force today, all "het up" aqueenleah-8/9/2006
23342How nice that allancoleman has convinced you that he is a good guy, in spite of Honey_Bee-8/9/2006
23341No, allan is a good guy, just a bit too infatuated with Brinker's advertisinKirk ©-8/9/2006
23340" A common excuse about the QQQ trade not being included in Bob's resulstockalot-8/9/2006
23339The speed at which Shres zeroed in on that post makes me think he's still smstockalot-8/9/2006
23338ROTFLMAO! <I>Maybe we can petition Dave to allow shills 2 or 3 phony ID&#Kirk ©-8/9/2006
23337 A common excuse about the QQQ trade not being included in Bob's results is pigstuff-8/9/2006
23336>>Did you buy your friend Dija one to many brews? No, F451, no brews. pigstuff-8/9/2006
23335Yes, did you notice he was plugging Bob Brinker's products in forums that arKirk ©-8/9/2006
23334Kirk says... <b>"It seems allancoleman was not the first to say how shres-8/9/2006
23333Pig Good grief. Four out of the last ten posts at the "free discussion&qufahrenheit451-8/9/2006
23332Thanks for Catching Dija in three lies Lie #1 BBaddict was kicked off Lie #2 BBKirk ©-8/9/2006
23331FakeDija with convoluted spin says: >>bbaddict is posting, all right--but pigstuff-8/9/2006
23330Every time you mentioned my name today, which was a considerable number of timeHoney_Bee-8/9/2006
23329stockalot said: <<So if you think the biggest Brinker shill on 101 is lyidijaexyahoo-8/9/2006
23328<<I'm not so sure Bob_rules is missing. I think he was here as Queen90queenleah-8/8/2006
23327fahrenheit said: <<That sure sounds familiar. At the old Bob Brinker boardijaexyahoo-8/8/2006
23326"Seems to me most of the regular posters are here. Basher 5 two and jojo sestockalot-8/8/2006
23325dija said quoting pig: <i><<How would a rational and objective persoqueenleah-8/8/2006
23324" --If he said "top out," or if he used allancoleman's terminstockalot-8/8/2006
23323Guess you don't have anything agains lying. That will put you in good steastockalot-8/8/2006
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):