SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
SDL, Inc. [Nasdaq: SDLI]
An SI Board Since November 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3951 68 0 SDLI
Emcee:  pat mudge Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2351<i>Please join me in making Irregardless a Real Word. Use it ofTen. </pat mudge-7/24/2000
2350Pat, From the article link you posted, interesting quote: "Corning was waWyätt Gwyön-7/24/2000
2349<i>I won't hesistate to flip back into JDSU if the discount shrinks bat2-7/24/2000
2348<i>So you don't buy the idea of the index funds being like a black holWyätt Gwyön-7/24/2000
2347T2, looks like I could have saved another 2% and picked up SDLI at a 21% discoundjia101362-7/24/2000
2346newsalert.com <i>. . ."Investors always overestimate what's goinpat mudge-7/24/2000
2345"Worst case JDSU will have to lighten up in certain product areas much likepat mudge-7/24/2000
2344"The S&P addition for JDSU is also a one-time, non-fundamental event whGuy Gordon-7/24/2000
2343"Worst case JDSU will have to lighten up in certain product areas much likeGuy Gordon-7/24/2000
2342Sonet strikes back: lightreading.com NT-GLW speculation: lightreading.compat mudge-7/24/2000
2341Mucho -- For a different take on the over-all market, you may want to catch thepat mudge-7/24/2000
2340T2, I'd like to get your thoughts on a covered call strategy for this week idjia101362-7/24/2000
2339I understand your point about the sequential figures, thanks eom.Wyätt Gwyön-7/24/2000
2338I agree. Forward guidance is most important, which is why I think the 50% revenuDukeCrow-7/24/2000
2337I realize that. I was just detailing the growth by showing the Q1 breakout. In mDukeCrow-7/24/2000
2336I think the internal figure given was like 31%. The diff between that and your 3Wyätt Gwyön-7/24/2000
2335[deleted] Pat posted it first!DukeCrow-7/24/2000
2334The internal growth figures were detailed in the CC. Also impressive were GMs, aWyätt Gwyön-7/24/2000
2333It was an impressive quarter, but a lot of that sequential revenue growth was thDukeCrow-7/24/2000
2332<i>Does anyone else find it kind of ironic that Corning (if the story is tpat mudge-7/24/2000
2331Does anyone else find it kind of ironic that Corning (if the story is true) willWyätt Gwyön-7/24/2000
2330djia, I think most believe that the deal will get by the regulators. One way I wt2-7/24/2000
2329Guy, you are absolutely correct. I think you'll find a more balanced respondjia101362-7/24/2000
2328Glancing at the competitive landscape, I found a couple JDSU contracts that indipat mudge-7/23/2000
2327CC SEC filing; freeedgar.com [Q&A not included] >>> I. OPERpat mudge-7/23/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News