Digital Equipment Corp. (DEC) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
Digital Equipment Corp. (DEC)

An SI Board Since May 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
3276	17	0	DEC

Emcee: Dave Gahm	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
2351	>>All of this long term business development, at the expense of INTEL. I	vegetarian	-	10/28/1997
2350	George; don't you think that DEC should now use their cash to institute a B	stock bull	-	10/28/1997
2349	I agree DEC is more attractive with its new forward Price to Book. We'll b	Tom M	-	10/28/1997
2348	With Intel paying the salaries of 2000 people for DEC people. DEC will save $1	William L. Vu	-	10/28/1997
2347	Lets talk takeover again. Speaking of monkeys, DEC is now more of a merger/aqu	George Dvorsky	-	10/28/1997
2346	Anyone surprised that DEC gave up its StrongARM chip? Hasn't Palmer been t	Joey Smith	-	10/28/1997
2345	One technical "monkey on our back" now gone, gap closing excercise co	Tom M	-	10/28/1997
2344	Zam, on your prophetic comments: DEC got hurt when dollar was strong, mostly	Greg Jung	-	10/28/1997
2343	Zam, "All of you forget that DEC is very highly exposed to the foreign ma	John Sladek	-	10/28/1997
2342	All of you forget that DEC is very highly exposed to the foreign markets.If The	Zam	-	10/28/1997
2341	Rob I like the qoute "He said Digital hopes to use the Hudson facility to	Dean Amo	-	10/27/1997
2340	Samir, Let me interject that I believe Digital will dominate in the short term	Rob Young	-	10/27/1997
2339	>>When Digital finally sheds itslef of these added expenditures DEC	vegetarian	-	10/27/1997
2338	<i> To: P.T.Burnem (2215 ) From: George Dvorsky	P.T.Burnem	-	10/27/1997
2337	I just listened to conference call (available for the next day). (800) 633-828	jonpcar	-	10/27/1997
2336	John and company, First off, I should mention that management now believes Alp	Samir Jain	-	10/27/1997
2335	Thanks Samir and Tom. EOM	Bob Walsh	-	10/27/1997
2334	Samir, Any idea on what the operating costs of that fab were. While I do not	John J. Thrall	-	10/27/1997
2333	Bob, I think you may have gotten your question answered but... We met in the	Samir Jain	-	10/27/1997
2332	Bob, the enclosed press release says the deal is worth $1.5B. Came from Reuter	Tom M	-	10/27/1997
2331	Dean, I have seen Palmer do some stupid things. In one case certain groups we	Bob Walsh	-	10/27/1997
2330	"Intel also told reporters and analysts on a conference call that it would	Dean Amo	-	10/27/1997
2329	Samir, you said "According to management, there is apparently a lot more m	Bob Walsh	-	10/27/1997
2328	George, I think that the suit was strong enough, but Palmer didn't have the	Bob Walsh	-	10/27/1997
2327	It's important to note that the $700M is simply the up-front cash. Accordi	Samir Jain	-	10/27/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):