SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Trading IOMEGA based on technical analysis
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1511 12 0 IOM
Emcee:  Elliot Brenner Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
236 donald, my stuff also reacts the same way. I know the sharp increases and decrJGS-1/20/1997
235 First, I use 2 market tools as predictors. 1-the XGO formula/program, which traJGS-1/20/1997
234 Donald, I made a table of the profits (losses) of the 2 options spreads with IOBrian Lempel-1/20/1997
233 Brian, The "IN THE MONEY PUT/CALL" spread is not worth it. For aboudonald sew-1/20/1997
232 Donald, thank a lot for the advice. It's good to know that someone with moBrian Lempel-1/19/1997
231 Robert, Thanks for yr note, and you have some very good points. I never try tdonald sew-1/19/1997
230 I find that when a stock ends up behaving differently over a period of time, onRobert Graham-1/19/1997
229 Brian, Great idea. BOX the darn thing with PUTS and CALLS. The only way to ldonald sew-1/19/1997
228 JGS, What scares me is that in the past IOM was fairly predictable with the tedonald sew-1/19/1997
227 Donald, your mention of options and earnings brings into mind a strategically sBrian Lempel-1/19/1997
226 May I ask what indicators you are using that has helped you give the "1st Robert Graham-1/18/1997
225 Donald: My indicators also expected a recent up move, however, consolidation isJGS-1/18/1997
224 Stephen, Those are good question? I have stop-loss limits, and for a stock indonald sew-1/17/1997
223 There are too many variables which will only lead to very subjective and potentStephen M. Neal-1/16/1997
222 John, <This is very dangerous practice. You sound as if you know exactly Wayners-1/14/1997
221 updated IOM at jps.net (for those who care) Hi again Don. I don't use 10 Tracy Ching-1/13/1997
220 Guy, If any of those indicators you mentioned, showed bullish - IOM would havedonald sew-1/13/1997
219 Donald: That's heartening. Could you list which indicators you look at? Guy Gordon-1/13/1997
218 To thread, When technically analyzing a stock, I use up to 10 different indicadonald sew-1/12/1997
217 John, Your question regarding what to expect to hear from Iomega management aboDale Stempson-1/12/1997
216 Technical Help & Program for Mac users__ biz.yahoo.com saw this today, caj g cordes-1/12/1997
215 Hello everyone here... by reading some posts I assume there are metastock usersj g cordes-1/12/1997
214 John: Actually, at $17/sh the PE for IOM is just under 50, not 60 like you posGuy Gordon-1/11/1997
213 John, I agree with you that it's a very dangerous practice to double your pHerb Fuller-1/11/1997
212 This is very dangerous practice. You sound as if you know exactly what IOM is john dodson-1/11/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News