SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Brokerage-Chat Site Securities Fraud: A Lawsuit
An SI Board Since June 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
3143 54 0
Emcee:  CountofMoneyCristo Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2368In case any of you missed this yesterday among the many posts, I'll repost iCountofMoneyCristo-7/25/2003
23677. If Rea swore under oath, under penalty of perjury that Trading Places never mCountofMoneyCristo-7/25/2003
23665. If Rea swore under oath, under penalty of perjury that Trading Places never mCountofMoneyCristo-7/25/2003
2365Message 19147125 <b>Today's Date October 5, 1998 Chicago, IL... TradCountofMoneyCristo-7/25/2003
2364Questions for you: 1. Are stocks securities? 2. Are picks recommendations? 3. ACountofMoneyCristo-7/25/2003
2363So far, only one judge has ruled on pre-trial law and motion, that's it.CountofMoneyCristo-7/25/2003
2362I have only asked for sanctions against Defendants Terra Nova Trading and CyberTCountofMoneyCristo-7/25/2003
2361How many judges and lawyers have been before with the issue and they rejected yobenchpress550-7/25/2003
2360We will have to wait and see what the Court of Appeal says on that issue. I belCountofMoneyCristo-7/25/2003
2359So Rea and Trading Places had no advisory function whatsoever, never made any reCountofMoneyCristo-7/25/2003
2358You have asked for sanctions against the defendants many times - have any ever bbenchpress550-7/25/2003
2357Your claims you can proved perjury and obstruction - has any judge or prosecutorbenchpress550-7/25/2003
2356You get asked a few simple questions and you run away. Well, in that respect, yCountofMoneyCristo-7/25/2003
2355Maybe if they select 1 play that won as their "record" they might claiCountofMoneyCristo-7/25/2003
2354By the way Rea said TP had "no advisory function whatsoever." Even yoCountofMoneyCristo-7/25/2003
2353< Those questions were all answered. Pay attention. > No they were not alDave O.-7/25/2003
2352< If they were "suggestions," then why did Rea claim 94% accuracy?Dave O.-7/25/2003
2351You have yet to address <i>SEC v. Park</i>, which held that InternetCountofMoneyCristo-7/25/2003
2350You asked whether claims were filed for many clients. I answered you. You contCountofMoneyCristo-7/25/2003
2349Now please explain my Rea appeal, and the photos I took of the Trading Places anCountofMoneyCristo-7/25/2003
2348< Think Cyber defrauded only 3 clients, that that's how they sold Cyber fDave O.-7/25/2003
2347Those questions were all answered. Pay attention.CountofMoneyCristo-7/25/2003
2346< I cannot recall a single post where you conceded any of the many obvious poDave O.-7/25/2003
2345You addressed Pristine statements, defending them. If you do, supporting the orCountofMoneyCristo-7/25/2003
2344< Please explain to me if you think it is not a violation of various securityDave O.-7/25/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News