SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
ViaSat
An SI Board Since January 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1112 33 0 VSAT
Emcee:  Christopher Gates Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
237 Don, I have long given up on VSAT as a small stand alone defense contractor. Ramsey Su-4/22/1999
236 Bernard....agree that VSAT has it's nose deep into defense and seems to be Don Limb-4/22/1999
235 Good point, Bernard, I think that assessment is right on. VSAT will trade as aThomas-4/22/1999
234 Don: I think that the culture of defense contractors makes them ill suited forBernard Levy-4/21/1999
233 I'm absolutely amazed that this stock is heading for the cellar. What in tDon Limb-4/21/1999
232 Given that VSAT is trading well below its IPO price, the stock is not fine, andBernard Levy-4/21/1999
231 Stock is fine, IMO. Look for steady move up as we head towards earnings. mikeEyeDrMike-4/21/1999
230 Well, well, well: we are moving towards single digit P/E territory. Should we fBernard Levy-4/21/1999
229 just in from VSAT IR: We planned a release, but were beaten to the punch by a EyeDrMike-3/31/1999
228 Mike, You could not have been more right. One little news clip and we zoom toAusdauer-3/31/1999
227 ViaSat Receives $30 Million IDIQ Ordering Contract from U.S. Navy CARLSBAD, CaEyeDrMike-3/31/1999
226 Hello, recently awakened VSAT board members, just a thought: given the market aThomas-3/31/1999
225 i think by SEC regs, all materially relevant contracts are required to be reporEyeDrMike-3/30/1999
224 Mike, I agree. I think it would be nice to have a PR if it is already in tAusdauer-3/30/1999
223 i agree, they need to widen the scope of the business. Personally, i am dumbfouEyeDrMike-3/30/1999
222 Mike, I don't disagree, but it would be nice to break from the reigns oAusdauer-3/30/1999
221 last i looked, $30 mil from the government is the same currency as $30 mil in tEyeDrMike-3/30/1999
220 Bernard, Careful about what you say about low flying Stealth fighters. (ThAusdauer-3/30/1999
219 Dr. Mike, It would be nice if it were anything but a U.S. Govt. Defense/MilAusdauer-3/30/1999
218 the IR guy has been out sick for 2 days, could explain the lack of press releasEyeDrMike-3/30/1999
217 Bernard: Quite bizarre. The contract is over 3 years, I believe, but is stillValueman-3/30/1999
216 Hi Valueman: Don't you think it is bizarre that the company gets an order Bernard Levy-3/30/1999
215 This contract could be worth even more. I think the problem is that not a soul Valueman-3/30/1999
214 The new Navy contract was for almost two full quarters of revenue, adding 50% tdwight martin-3/30/1999
213 No press release to be found, but this story was in the San Diego Tribune SaturValueman-3/29/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):