SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
INTEL FOR TECHNICIANS
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1513 9 0 INTC
Emcee:  jmac Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
238 Jery nimble rhymes with Kimbell(my wife)- So I am familiar with the subject(ggggonzongo-3/15/1997
237 Jim, It is not a good ideal to short MSFT. MSFT is the only one tech stock I kjim shiau-3/15/1997
236 Nancy, When I write calls, I will not write anything longer than the current Jim Cash-3/15/1997
235 Jim, You're post echoes my sentiments exactly. I really thought that 140SteelBlueIce-3/15/1997
234 Andy, You are correct, INTC is currently in a downtrend and any bounces shoulSteelBlueIce-3/15/1997
233 Jerry, My analysis is telling me go short below 137 but it will hurt. I reallJim Cash-3/15/1997
232 Comments and questions: 1. I've found MACD to be an excellent trading indGary105-3/15/1997
231 It's interesting how INTC fell along with AMD when the lawsuit was releasedChi-X-3/14/1997
230 Jerry- i have been thinking about this all day- remember I have been saying 132gonzongo-3/14/1997
229 Nancy, You did get some responses so I wont be redundant. What is fast approaSteelBlueIce-3/14/1997
228 Christian, Your long term prediction is noted and it can very possibily happeSteelBlueIce-3/14/1997
227 Hi X, The timing was good on both the entry and the exit, the only trouble waSteelBlueIce-3/14/1997
226 We sure didn't get much of a bounce. But, I wouldn't short INTC. Becajmac-3/14/1997
225 On March 10 I wrote you: " | Next | Respond | To: Jerry Gatto (164 ) FChristian Atallah-3/14/1997
224 No, I am not sure about write puts :) Writing puts at support has been good, aNancy-3/14/1997
223 Jim, >The next support happens to be 137. After that we are looking at 127 Kevin-3/14/1997
222 I would short intel on any bounce. I think we still have some more downside to Christian Atallah-3/14/1997
221 The next support happens to be 137. After that we are looking at 127 5/8. Are yJim Cash-3/14/1997
220 To all technicians, INTC closed at 137 today - where is the next support levelNancy-3/14/1997
219 I think you'll make some good money.Christian Atallah-3/14/1997
218 Hi Jerry, That was a very nice sense of timing. Do you have a booth on the tradxstuckey-3/14/1997
217 Intel just filed suit against AMD and CYRX MillsJeff Mills-3/14/1997
216 Jerry, Makes sense to me, getting out before the weekend. A lot of people havJohn K-3/14/1997
215 Hi John and All, The strength the techs exhibited with the weakness yesterdaySteelBlueIce-3/14/1997
214 I have a different definition of prior high and low points than you. I use TomJim Cash-3/14/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News