SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
GZMO
An SI Board Since November 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
438 23 0 GZMO
Emcee:  mike mulhearn Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
238 OK Rick. I gave you scientific assumptions to make, as best as my limited knowljeffbas-2/20/2000
237 Jeffrey: With a bit of research and documentation, even given your narrow consscaram(o)uche-2/20/2000
236 For the scientifically inclined, this paper underlies the current melanoma vacjeffbas-2/19/2000
235 Rick, I would appreciate your opinion on the following since you live with stocjeffbas-2/19/2000
234 >> Would be nice to get on more independent financial footing. <scaram(o)uche-2/16/2000
233 Don't forget the $30 million equity line of credit with Genzyme, based on sjeffbas-2/16/2000
232 Best thing to happen to the company was the CEGE deal falling through. Saved 1rkrw-2/16/2000
231 >> Now, about that maspin ... << Used to be an old LXR project. Wscaram(o)uche-2/16/2000
230 rinne, not hostile, this is just in good fun, at least as far as I am concernedPseudo Biologist-2/16/2000
229 Was not a reference to a conspiracy but the fact that those left with the stockrinne-2/16/2000
228 Chuckle. I lead the world in money left on table in this rally. A classical pscaram(o)uche-2/16/2000
227 Today's move is probably in response to some investor forum they are at todjeffbas-2/16/2000
226 What? What fun are internet stock boards without conspiracy theories? Geez -gPseudo Biologist-2/16/2000
225 >> they can't hold it back much longer << What a crock. Yes, scaram(o)uche-2/16/2000
224 Hi Dave, In spite of this being a tracking stock, they can't hold it back rinne-2/16/2000
223 Monday February 7, 9:06 am Eastern Time Company Press Release SOURCE: Genzymescaram(o)uche-2/7/2000
222 Perhaps not even peripherally related..... Clin Cancer Res 2000 Jan;6(1):166-7scaram(o)uche-2/4/2000
221 Mike, I bought it for your reasons long before there were any GZMO threads. Somjeffbas-1/26/2000
220 I finally went over to the Yahoo thread to do some reading--it's funny, I Mike McFarland-1/26/2000
219 Yeah, the antiangiogenic applications of AT III are 25% GZTC's. (eom) scaram(o)uche-1/26/2000
218 I guess this is the url for the list: genzyme.com The vaccines should be listedMike McFarland-1/26/2000
217 Chuckle.... you're comparing to BIOM. I'm here for ATIII. What do scaram(o)uche-1/26/2000
216 heheh. Well whether I can truly understand the genetics or not, the SAGE tool Mike McFarland-1/26/2000
215 >> is my terminology okay? << Go, go, go, go!!!! <g> scaram(o)uche-1/26/2000
214 Just got the answer back from Genzyme clarifying the wording in the GENZ annuaMike McFarland-1/26/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):