SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Netcom
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2601 5 0 NETC
Emcee:  Colin Perry Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2401 Tell me, how does DG project to a crowded room of investors? Colin Perry-12/12/1997
2400 MK, Curtis, Colin, Paul, etc., I apologized for any offense taken from what wasOeconomicus-12/12/1997
2399 OH NO, not again! MKMichael Kim-12/12/1997
2398 Hey Colin...glad your still around. I'm saying bye-bye in the morning. SellRichard Makowiec-12/11/1997
2397 <<<Now, if you want to start a fight, do it with someone else.>>Richard Makowiec-12/11/1997
2396 Rich, chill. Have you no sense of humor? If you took offense at my noting what Oeconomicus-12/11/1997
2395 "It is a great thread...even when I'm out of Netcom I'll still visColin Perry-12/11/1997
2394 <<<but that was months ago so my timing wasn't quite so amusing>Richard Makowiec-12/11/1997
2393 Rich, $20 1/2 and $21 1/4 to be precise. Two or three more points would have beOeconomicus-12/11/1997
2392 This is from a Reuters story after the close today: <i>''ArmstroOeconomicus-12/11/1997
2391 <<<Thwack! Ouch! Thwack! Ouch!>>> Yeah I guess...had to trimRichard Makowiec-12/11/1997
2390 If the market settles and merger mania picks up again I will pick up some WCII.Roader-12/11/1997
2389 I don't know much about LCI, but if they have any measureable share of the Oeconomicus-12/11/1997
2388 Wow! What a day! What gives? Why the move? Especially today when it was harMichael Kim-12/11/1997
2387 I think this explains why ICGX is up. The article just meant to say ICGX not LRoader-12/11/1997
2386 These two being up 2 3/4 on a bad day like today should at least get a mention,Oeconomicus-12/11/1997
2385 I've been in ICGX since it traded around $8 a couple of years ago. It traRBattman-12/11/1997
2384 Paul, I think most of us wondered the same thing during a certain mysterious raOeconomicus-12/11/1997
2383 Michael, Any idea what is causing the accumulation in ICGX today? Whatever isPaul Haynes-12/11/1997
2382 This is the strangest stock I've ever seen. Congrats to the hardcore that Michael Kim-12/11/1997
2381 Anyone heard any news to explain the rally in ICGX? $25 3/8! Go Go! Like a kidOeconomicus-12/11/1997
2380 I'm glad to see you guys are keeping this thread alive. I still watch it onbill-12/11/1997
2379 I'm afraid to look today. I'm glad I don't own anything in Korea. Michael Kim-12/11/1997
2378 Rich, heard yesterday that Korea had to cancel a note auction because of a totaOeconomicus-12/11/1997
2377 <<<...alot of astute investors here, yourself included.>>> IMichael Kim-12/10/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News