SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
NRAG-NorAm Gaming-Winning The Battle
An SI Board Since September 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
441 0 0 NRAG
Emcee:  Alan Coccio Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
241 David you are correct. Sharp Image is trying to move along as George is. The Ga Bard-11/29/1997
240 You guys lay off Catawbakid!!! He is entitled to his opinion and besides, I waArtieM-11/28/1997
239 Only a great stock could pull together all these people on a holiday weekend! C. Riley-11/28/1997
238 Sharp Image: part 2 If anyone is expecting me to add anything to my previous pDavid W. Tucker-11/28/1997
237 Where do you guys come from .... MRBIGAIR refused to give me the address and Ga Bard-11/28/1997
236 I understand your position,but more people will listen to someone who whispers Due Diligence-11/28/1997
235 Jimbo: Yes I'm the one who posted a message entitled "Why BNGO IS TANDavid W. Tucker-11/28/1997
234 Riley that is a very acurate and solid post. GBGa Bard-11/28/1997
233 I received the following E-mail from JEFF JALLO/MRBIGAIR and he requested I posArtieM-11/28/1997
232 Me thinks NRAG management is very,very positive or why would they go through thDue Diligence-11/28/1997
231 FACT: 10Q's FROM COMPANIES ON THE **BIG BOARDS** ARE NOT AUDITED!! The SECC. Riley-11/28/1997
230 I agree with all of your points. I mostly wanted to point out the facts about David W. Tucker-11/28/1997
229 YEP! An opposing view is good if it is rational and not filled with inflamationDue Diligence-11/28/1997
228 Perhaps Jeff meant that Noram is in full SEC reporting compliance. Because the C. Riley-11/28/1997
227 What is your problem? You should get your facts straight before you post.Are yoDue Diligence-11/28/1997
226 NORAM IS NOT AUDITED I must beg to differ. As I have noted on BOBz in a respoDavid W. Tucker-11/28/1997
225 Patience and the successful NRAG investor... Patience is a bitter plant with sC. Riley-11/28/1997
224 Nice post! Do believe the momentum players are gone for now and NRAG will contiDue Diligence-11/28/1997
223 The trouble with the world... is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligeC. Riley-11/28/1997
222 Well said. Calling the company is a better way to do the DD, instead of relyingDue Diligence-11/28/1997
221 All I am saying... Why are you so "suspicious" of Noram's dissemArtieM-11/28/1997
220 Thank you for accusing me of wanting to 'dog' Sharp Image, being a 'Catawbakid-11/28/1997
219 IMO, MRBIGAIR has been completely honest and passionate about Noram in EVERY poArtieM-11/28/1997
218 David, Thanks for the insight and projections. Will start nibbling. MChenwlheatmoon-11/28/1997
217 Chen: Don't look too long. Do your DD. Study the press announcements carDavid W. Tucker-11/27/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):