SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Oak Technology (OAKT)
An SI Board Since September 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4335 22 0 OAKT
Emcee:  Clam Clam Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2410 Does anybody know when Oakt will announce their numbers for this last quarter?Sparky65-3/11/1997
2409 Further to my earlier post regarding CD-R/CD-RW drives is this article. First Bonzo-3/11/1997
2408 Sparky, Oak has a very volatile business, as you are probably aware. We are iClam Clam-3/11/1997
2407 I agree with your assessment of OAKT's controller business. It still is a fBonzo-3/11/1997
2406 clam clam, I have seen many people on this thread say that this stock is over vSparky65-3/11/1997
2405 Sparky65, I think it can break 14 when investors get comfortable on Oak sustaiClam Clam-3/11/1997
2404 Clam Clam, you mentioned that now is the time to get back into OAKT. Then statSparky65-3/10/1997
2403 Time to get back into OAKT. It might fluctuate between $11 and $13 for a whileClam Clam-3/10/1997
2402 Maybe they need above 5% to push their issues...what are their issues?........HardMoney-3/9/1997
2401 Who is Galleon Partners and why would they want that much. The lurking public Ralph Staunton-3/9/1997
2400 In this weeks Baron's it says that a group led by Galleon Partners completeMichael H. Dragon-3/9/1997
2399 That is only a tiny amount of shares.Acres H-3/9/1997
2398 to all! there were one form 144 filed with the SEC ..selling of OAKT sharespatrick-3/9/1997
2397 Sparky65: if you go into quotes and then into research, it tells you if there imoh-3/6/1997
2396 Sparky65, The analyst upgrade from buy to strong buy shown in the most recent Fred Fahmy-3/6/1997
2395 Moh, is there anywhere we can find out when and why the Zacks analyst went to aSparky65-3/5/1997
2394 Zacks is indicating that one of the analysts have increased his/her recommendatmoh-3/5/1997
2393 Thanks James and Joe, I'm very sceptical of OAKT for obvious reasons if yoTrent Stepp-3/5/1997
2392 Joe, Thank you to help me to answer Trent's questions. I don't haveJames Yu-3/4/1997
2391 Trent, OAKTs DVD involvement to date is indeed a software solution only. Their Bonzo-3/4/1997
2390 James, According to the article which you posted a link to, OAKT only has one Trent Stepp-3/4/1997
2389 Thank you for posting. I read the whole article this time and learned a lessonZencone-3/3/1997
2388 Baruch, Be very carefully to read two pargarphs: one is from OAKT's senJames Yu-3/3/1997
2387 Baruch, Read the whole article, oakt is mentioned. Da bullBull-like-3/3/1997
2386 James: If Oak is the leader, why are they not mentioned? Can you refer me to Zencone-3/3/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):