DCH Technologies (DCH) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks
DCH Technologies (DCH)

An SI Board Since February 1998

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
2513	29	0	DCH

Emcee: trader	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
2413	Current and relevant updated summary of DCHT: Courtesy of Zekel from the Ragin	Scoobah	-	4/18/2000
2412	I don't get it Oak Tree....that link doesn't show Haberman as having so	Dan B.	-	4/9/2000
2411	George, I was long on it for over a year as well. But I think it is more likely	Oak Tree	-	4/8/2000
2410	Insiders have sold about 150K shares over the last month or so. S. Socoloske 15	Oak Tree	-	4/8/2000
2409	Have been long on this one for the last couple years..Got on at 2.00, saw it ra	George Nemeth	-	4/4/2000
2408	Dan: I did post more data on Dr. Haberman's sales over on the RB thread yes	Sid Turtlman	-	4/4/2000
2407	Sid, we'll see indeed. By the by, if the DCHT filings HAD been thoroughl	Dan B.	-	4/4/2000
2406	Dan B: No hurt feelings at all, and I hope that you don't take offence at m	Sid Turtlman	-	4/3/2000
2405	Sid, IMO you continue to overstate the negative case. Period. I don't o	Dan B.	-	4/3/2000
2404	Dan B: Obviously, it would be nice if I had a sworn affidavit from the customer	Sid Turtlman	-	4/3/2000
2403	Sid, If you are right, I won't be terribly surprised, but surprised non-th	Dan B.	-	4/3/2000
2402	Unofficial DCHT Investors' Site enotsder.com	enotsder	-	4/2/2000
2401	Dan: If there was any remaining question as to whether DCHT's management is	Sid Turtlman	-	3/31/2000
2400	Ya know, he twisted your words, IMO, and that was really bad, and is the kind o	Dan B.	-	3/30/2000
2399	>>Oh, BTW, forget about responding with your multiple paragraphs, you'	Skeeter Bug	-	3/29/2000
2398	Oh, BTW, forget about responding with your multiple paragraphs, you're on i	Scottoo	-	3/29/2000
2397	My god, if you have read this drivel, can you believe these people? Absolutely	Scottoo	-	3/29/2000
2396	db, no doubt i want things to turn out well. if this is a bubble that pops, it	Skeeter Bug	-	3/29/2000
2395	Well, I suppose this can be debated by many smarter than us. Suffice it to say	Dan B.	-	3/29/2000
2394	dan, the unadulterated numbers do not support your "this time it's dif	Skeeter Bug	-	3/28/2000
2393	OT >>..the bettys didn't increase gdp at a significantly faster than	Dan B.	-	3/28/2000
2392	>>Since Betty is cut out and Joe is doing more of the work with his own m	Skeeter Bug	-	3/28/2000
2391	Sid, current equipment investment has nothing to do with the relative costs of	Dan B.	-	3/28/2000
2390	OT: Skeeter, Re:" joe cuts out betty. joe makes $0.50 per glass instead	Dan B.	-	3/28/2000
2389	Dan: "The backlog problem, so far as it is based on an informal reporting	Sid Turtlman	-	3/27/2000

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):