SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Advanced Micro vs Intel (AMD / INTC)
An SI Board Since March 2007
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2596 38 0 ^SOX
Emcee:  rupert1 Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2421Chipguy <i>You see that Intel is not the low cost producer, AMD is.</iElmer Phud-9/20/2007
2420planet3dnow.de It's about 3/4 the way down.Elmer Phud-9/20/2007
2419<i>Then how do you explain that at the same process level, AMD is much quichipguy-9/20/2007
2418<i>AMD's dual core 65nm product can not reach the performance levels okpf-9/20/2007
2417Tim - You didn't address this to me but I'll take a stab at it: <i&gElmer Phud-9/20/2007
2416 But how much of AMD's former advantage (at the same process node) was due TimF-9/20/2007
2415Dear Chipguy: Then how do you explain that at the same process level, AMD is mupgerassi-9/20/2007
2414<i>So when does the law of diminishing returns set in?</i> I donchipguy-9/20/2007
2413mas Fair is fair. You called this one. I didn't think they'd do it but Elmer Phud-9/19/2007
2412<i> I am glad to see that you finally admitted your Tri-Core prediction imas_-9/19/2007
2411So when does the law of diminishing returns set in?...produce something very googzubeck-9/19/2007
2410<i>We could be having this same discussion in 10 years with another couplechipguy-9/19/2007
2409<i>My guess is he does not post because he was stopped.</i> His proElmer Phud-9/19/2007
2408muzio <i>do you really think there is any chance we can do .45nm optical Elmer Phud-9/19/2007
2407<i>couple of decimal points added on.</i> i think you need to rethimuzosi-9/19/2007
2406<i> Dr Gordon Moore said that he expected the proposition that bears his nElmer Phud-9/19/2007
2405Robert - I was wrong about those tri-cores too. I really didn't think they&Elmer Phud-9/19/2007
2404Intel chips away at AMD New micoprocessors are behind Intel's attempt to pegrupert1-9/19/2007
2403IBM unveils nanotechnology chip advance First use of "nanoscale materials&qrupert1-9/19/2007
2402Chip Chap The next step in the silicon industry's steadfast pursuit of everrupert1-9/19/2007
2401My guess is he does not post because he was stopped. He then changed his name trupert1-9/19/2007
2400<i> I am glad to see that you finally admitted your Tri-Core prediction isFJB-9/19/2007
2399Droids avert your eyes... 2 Socket Nehalem running multiple apps with 16 threadElmer Phud-9/18/2007
2398Intel's Press Release: intel.com <i>Intel News Release Intel DemonstElmer Phud-9/18/2007
2397<i>By the way is that what you meant by "the baby is here" post Elmer Phud-9/18/2007
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News