SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Fox News
An SI Board Since August 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
718 20 0
Emcee:  Thomas M. Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
243Just one snippet from a great article about Katherine Graham: <<< RobeThomas M.-5/31/2003
242Bill O'Reilly speaks almost as much as the guest he is interviewing! <b&Thomas M.-5/31/2003
241Hmmm..... Or, using ad hoc make-it-up-as-we-go-along reasoning, maybe low populLazarus_Long-5/30/2003
240LA Times Deletes Key Paragraphs from Web Version of Article thememoryhole.orgTigerPaw-5/30/2003
239I think liberalism is a product of population density. Low densities tend towarTigerPaw-5/29/2003
238Oh. Well. Then maybe you better stick to what you know. For a change.Lazarus_Long-5/29/2003
237I am more familiar with Texas than California. California certainly has the repTigerPaw-5/29/2003
236Do you deny that CA in general, and the SF Bay Area in particular, are liberal?Lazarus_Long-5/29/2003
235Military Pundit Sues Fox News Over Al Qaeda Tape reuters.com LOS ANGELES (ReutRaymond Duray-5/29/2003
234IT'S SHOWTIME! Bush gets a 9/11 make-over, courtesy of the Canadian taxpayerRaymond Duray-5/29/2003
233I'm sure they all seem liberal to you. TPTigerPaw-5/29/2003
232Does that include these guys? Message 18983821 You do know, don't you, thatLazarus_Long-5/29/2003
231Public confidence in the media, already low, continues to slip. Only 36%, among TigerPaw-5/29/2003
230General education of its critics- -you included.Lazarus_Long-5/28/2003
229No.Thomas M.-5/28/2003
228Thomas, Do you suppose this AP/USA Today story will ever get into 19th Century Raymond Duray-5/28/2003
227What does this have to do with Fox News? TomThomas M.-5/28/2003
226No Wars, Only Scandals By ROBERT L. BARTLEY Clinton spinmeister Sidney BLazarus_Long-5/28/2003
225FAIR asks: Does Stossel Deserve a Promotion? fair.org Snip: Starting tonighRaymond Duray-5/28/2003
224SI is a priceless treasure trove: "I see a parade of leftie whackos on FOXThomas M.-5/23/2003
223<b>Broadcast News </b> This week in the magazThomas M.-5/22/2003
222FCC Commissioners, Not a Monolithic Evil Donald, Re: <i>TM: "The aiRaymond Duray-5/21/2003
221<i>seriously doubt the Federal Communication Commission will agree to yourTigerPaw-5/21/2003
220This is my kind of media critique. When you read this, bear in mind that the NYThomas M.-5/21/2003
219>>The airwaves are a common resource and should not be assigned to a singlDonaldm-5/20/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):