SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Internet Analysis - Discussion
An SI Board Since January 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
419 14 0
Emcee:  musea Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
244 Chuz, I'm sure that others have mentioned this before, still... Probably jbn3-3/29/1999
243 Hi Melissa, its been some time since we've chatted. An SKU is a stock-keepChuzzlewit-3/29/1999
242 Thank you for your thoughtful comments. You have raised far too many points forChuzzlewit-3/29/1999
241 Chuzz Good couple of posts from you re general considerations on valuing “intedpk-3/28/1999
240 Chuzz, Just found this thread yesterday. I have two questions...what is an SKMelissa McAuliffe-3/28/1999
239 Thanks for the links Vendit, they are much appreciated. Since those analyses weChuzzlewit-3/28/1999
238 <b>I think I have shot my entire intellectual wad on this sector. I welcoVendit™-3/28/1999
237 jhg, I haven't even gotten to the issue of valuation. I am as confused as mChuzzlewit-3/28/1999
236 Chuz, I see you have unburdened your self of a magnum opus on e-tailers. I havejhg_in_kc-3/28/1999
235 WOW!.......BP Amoco in Talks to Acquire Arco for $25 Billion in Stock, Report Spuborectalis-3/28/1999
234 Part 4 and perhaps final part <b>The BKS paradigm</b> Disclosure:Chuzzlewit-3/28/1999
233 Part 3 of an unknown number of parts. <i>A second paradigm for e-tailingChuzzlewit-3/28/1999
232 Kevin, I think that inflation would work quite well in such schemes because repChuzzlewit-3/28/1999
231 CTC, I just started reading this thread today. I find your analysis to be exceKevin Collins-3/28/1999
230 General Considerations Part 2 of an unknown number of parts <b> A thoughChuzzlewit-3/28/1999
229 Good morning Bachman, You asked <i>Query: will not the 'elimination Chuzzlewit-3/28/1999
228 This is "must" reading: nytimes.comEdwarda-3/28/1999
227 re E-value-ating the e-tailers: Chuz, you stated <i>... The principle adjbn3-3/28/1999
226 You thought you had a big portfolio..........http://www.nytimes.com/yr/mo/day/npuborectalis-3/28/1999
225 All I am cautioning is, do it on the margin and not with money you need. Edwarda-3/27/1999
224 One does not invest in Internet stocks....you trade them over and over again.Supuborectalis-3/27/1999
223 The problem with this mode of investing is that when the perception is broken, Edwarda-3/27/1999
222 I trade stocks like AMZN in contrast to INTC,LU,SUNW,CSCO and MSFT which are lopuborectalis-3/27/1999
221 Chuzz, your point is well taken. I wish I could remember whether it was ForbesEdwarda-3/27/1999
220 Steven, I think you are missing the point. Companies like AMZN have no profitabChuzzlewit-3/27/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):