SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
MOLEGATE!
An SI Board Since September 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1719 6 0
Emcee:  Cisco Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
244<i>XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX MON SEPT 25, 2000 10:42:07 ET XXXXX GORE TEACisco-9/25/2000
243assume away.Shoot1st-9/25/2000
242<i>then I will assume that he knows more than I </i> I also assume tTigerPaw-9/25/2000
241I have no problem with that. It's actually very clever. Good for you.epicure-9/25/2000
240I completely disagree. I'm a biologist, in the general company I have been epicure-9/25/2000
239If what you are saying about Bush's plans are <I>true</I> then IShoot1st-9/25/2000
238Lying is a serious accusation. When you go around labeling jokes and flattery aTigerPaw-9/25/2000
237Why are less than half of those under 25 plan not to vote? <i>The pollsteCisco-9/25/2000
236<i>The spokesman, Ari Fleischer, said it "defies credibility" thCisco-9/25/2000
235ROFL!!Carolyn-9/25/2000
234When I'm driving down the road and I see a cop car coming the other way, I sAugustWest-9/25/2000
233Why did Gore suspend staffer if there was no mole? <b>Gore Staffer SuspenVendit™-9/25/2000
232I don't think so. Lying can be discussed in general company, your two examplCarolyn-9/25/2000
231<i>You are trying to spin me into the kind of person who thinks lying is OVendit™-9/25/2000
230End of day, fatigued by the many rather nasty posts, I say enough. That "tepicure-9/25/2000
229I always love your timing for exiting these types of discussions.Jorj X Mckie-9/25/2000
228Actually no, I thought shootie was arguing that your interpretation of what he sepicure-9/25/2000
227Are you saying that you didn't understand the example that gave? That wasn&Jorj X Mckie-9/25/2000
226Ha, Ha, you must have just added that to your vocabulary. Start thinking straigSelectric II-9/25/2000
225I don't choose to participate in exchanges that are merely ad hominem attacepicure-9/25/2000
224"No thanks I never touch the stuff" Life just isn't simple imo. epicure-9/25/2000
223g'night shootieJorj X Mckie-9/25/2000
222GOOD NIGHT THREAD. Shootie4X0Shoot1st-9/25/2000
221Ho, Ho, Ho, seems you're lost from the late 60's, early '70's. Selectric II-9/25/2000
220My example was: "no thanks, I never touch the stuff". and you bring iJorj X Mckie-9/25/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News