SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Source Media SRCM
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3015 11 0 SRCM
Emcee:  Steve Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2440 Thanks Art. Although I seldom dissect financial reports, I have often noticedPattie-5/4/1999
2439 When SRCM is denied (once again) its' warrant exercise $, TVG will dilute SSir Auric Goldfinger-5/4/1999
2438 <I>you've been pretty busy today for someone with no position in thisKevin Podsiadlik-5/4/1999
2437 Depends on how many options and other unregistered shs are floating around. On art slott-5/3/1999
2436 Not really. They're usually pretty close to the same number in my experiencRazorbak-5/3/1999
2435 Also, correct me if I'm wrong, but "outstanding shares" and "Pattie-5/3/1999
2434 hey kev; you've been pretty busy today for someone with no position in thiMW-5/3/1999
2433 Good point with DBCC. However, even though the DBCC price wasn't warranted Pattie-5/3/1999
2432 Group Lowers Stake In Source Media To 7.8% >SRCM. A group led by 21st CenturSir Auric Goldfinger-5/3/1999
2431 Well, sometimes we have to wait for the actual event to see what the impact is.Kevin Podsiadlik-5/3/1999
2430 Yes, it was my concern in February that this might be a problem down the road; Pattie-5/3/1999
2429 Just one more thing, then. According to the PR of 2/12/99 announcing the LetteKevin Podsiadlik-5/3/1999
2428 I agree on all your points; however, those points are only valid for the long tPattie-5/3/1999
2427 <I>Kevin, no offense, but it looks pretty normal to me, especially since Kevin Podsiadlik-5/3/1999
2426 Kevin, no offense, but it looks pretty normal to me, especially since we are noPattie-5/3/1999
2425 Very well then, Pattie, here is your chance to raise the level of dialogue hereKevin Podsiadlik-5/3/1999
2424 Thanks MW - I have noticed the nature of the posts regarding SRCM has changed sPattie-5/3/1999
2423 Wake up Mikey, SRCM almost out of cash:" They couldn't care less aboutSir Auric Goldfinger-5/2/1999
2422 Hi Pattie; Of course, welcome aboard. The yahoo board is a waste of time. I scMW-4/30/1999
2421 The latter. (Joking. Sort of.) One thing we all agree on: things are going tKevin Podsiadlik-4/30/1999
2420 Also, was the "not particularly" a response to "Am I welcome herPattie-4/30/1999
2419 Kevin, If I remember correctly, you (Kevin) and Archer are decent and informed Pattie-4/30/1999
2418 Not particularly, but come on in anyway... Oh yes, I remember you now, we had Kevin Podsiadlik-4/30/1999
2417 Hey MW - remember me from the Yahoo board? That board has gotten ridiculous andPattie-4/30/1999
2416 Kev, the real volumes over here. Half of it was institutional today. Message 9art slott-4/28/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News