Bay Networks (BAY) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
Bay Networks (BAY)

An SI Board Since March 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
4270	6	0	BAY

Emcee: John Messbauer	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
2445	Cruiser's a FAKE folks. Remember a few months ago he said that BAY would	The BayWatcher	-	12/22/1996
2444	So far, there has been no response from Cruise. I wonder why. Cruise has give	Cheng-yeh Chou	-	12/22/1996
2443	Thomas, Well said I was going to post a similar analysis but couldn't have	Timothy Tashjian	-	12/22/1996
2442	If House is indeed a good CEO, then Bay could make a strong comeback. Look what	Toby L. Toth	-	12/22/1996
2441	Some answer to your question might come from looking at BAY 5-year chart. BAY	Thomas C. White	-	12/21/1996
2440	Lacy, well said. your points about why my input is BS were enlightening <g&	Paul Body	-	12/21/1996
2439	Well said Paul,i agree with you 100%,that Bay is a failure and should seek out	adam hefian	-	12/20/1996
2438	Cruiser, I find your comments very interesting as well as a balance to some on	John Messbauer	-	12/20/1996
2437	I think this group has a lot of BS and we certainly should not listen to someon	Lacy Blackburn	-	12/20/1996
2436	I do not know why BAY has to be one of those cocky companies unwilling to accep	Paul Body	-	12/20/1996
2435	Hi Will In 1980, when IBM selected Intel microprocessor over Motorola, Hou	Vladimir Zelener	-	12/20/1996
2434	Hi Will: I have to disagree with your assumption that the downloadable soft	Vladimir Zelener	-	12/20/1996
2433	Well only time will tell Paul. I certainly agree though. It wont be CSCO or COM	Cruiser	-	12/20/1996
2432	Willie, you seem to overlook that I prefaced my comments with the caveat that i	Cruiser	-	12/20/1996
2431	hey Cruiser, I'm certain that CSCO and COMS will undoubtedly allow BAY righ	Paul Body	-	12/20/1996
2430	Thanks for the explanation - Intel is the maker of the computer though and I f	Will Burton	-	12/20/1996
2429	Cruiser, are you the one posted Bay is going to have a good quarter not too lon	Willie Hsung	-	12/20/1996
2428	As a trading stock, BAY has been much more profitable on the downside then on t	Daniel Goncharoff	-	12/20/1996
2427	Tim , Some stock's I trade and some I hold. Basically it just depends on	Mark The Trader	-	12/19/1996
2426	Mark,if you are a trader only look at momentum. You are cutting ot too close,by	Timothy Tashjian	-	12/19/1996
2425	Ibexx,you are exactly right! That is what I am trying to say! I cant remember w	Timothy Tashjian	-	12/19/1996
2424	well I thought I'd through my .02 cents in too... that's about all I ha	Cruiser	-	12/19/1996
2423	Ibexx, I pretty much agree with your logic, I always buy on weakness and sell	Mark The Trader	-	12/19/1996
2422	Mark the Trader, Glad you spoke up, and I have my $.02 to offer, too. Normal	Ibexx	-	12/19/1996
2421	Adam, I see you make a lot of comments but most have little substance. Do you	Mark The Trader	-	12/19/1996

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):