SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
MTIC - Is this the next EMC?
An SI Board Since May 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3748 35 0 MTIC
Emcee:  David Farnham Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2448 Greg, I will make more than he did buying the Oct. calls. Lou Cifer-6/12/1998
2447 I have to ask, Michael. Selling those puts with MTIC in the 7's must mean gmccon-6/12/1998
2446 WDC, SEG, Qntm, Maxtor,... make hard drives. EMC, MTIC,... use hard drives. Diamondhead-6/11/1998
2445 Lou, Good point, I thought the bottom was 13, then 10, then 8 and now 7? I thiNick-6/11/1998
2444 MTIC's market cap today is the same as the total revenues for 1999,can'Lou Cifer-6/11/1998
2443 "Still think Nasdaq can go to 1500. Have to admit MTIC is reaching an absuMark T. Heath-6/11/1998
2442 No way. Still think Nasdaq can go to 1500. Have to admit MTIC is reaching an abmichael piegza-6/11/1998
2441 Breaking though $8 on above average volume; that's another 10% today. DoesMark T. Heath-6/11/1998
2440 Michael, So do you think then that we have yet to see the bottom here? Nick Nick-6/11/1998
2439 As for buying WDC now, thats crazy. Why don't you just light your money on Mark T. Heath-6/11/1998
2438 "WDC at 11 looks a much better buy than MTIC at 8." As both a formerMark T. Heath-6/11/1998
2437 Greg, Still holding my puts. Will dump on Monday win, lose or draw. Have to thmichael piegza-6/11/1998
2436 Will anyone who began a short of this stock in the 10's please step forwardgmccon-6/11/1998
2435 The figures for Revenues for the cos. BXH and MTIC were from the WSJ...the numbKC-6/11/1998
2434 >> seems to me to indicate strong growth for the next couple of years. &lgmccon-6/11/1998
2433 Also, congratulations to all of you that knew or claim to have know that this wDiamondhead-6/11/1998
2432 ref. Yet industry expectations are for phenomenal growth in storage demandDiamondhead-6/11/1998
2431 I'm not sure the ATLPA story is a fair analogy, Lou. It ran up strong on tgmccon-6/11/1998
2430 >> "to all, navellier has downgraded mtic to A hold in his modeJRobinson-6/11/1998
2429 The stock was under selling pressure before and today the news helped get some Lou Cifer-6/11/1998
2428 Mark, I reviewed my notes on the CC and while my post may have been a bit too Lee-6/10/1998
2427 Your points are well taken. But I won't try to explain anything because liMark T. Heath-6/10/1998
2426 re: news If we take the low range of the estimate $53.5 million and $0.16 pLee-6/10/1998
2425 The company is making news, but for all the wrong reasons: fool.comMark T. Heath-6/10/1998
2424 I got the number ($140M) 2nd hand from "KC" who said he got it from tgmccon-6/10/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):