SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
INSS - International Network Services
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
446 3 0 INSS
Emcee:  Peter Moyer Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
246 Revenues cool off<but the boom in services should help make '98 a scorcGlenn D. Rudolph-12/10/1997
245 That's the beauty of Mathematics. So utterly devoid of emotion! [EOM]jas cooper-12/10/1997
244 <i>I agree with Todd. And 5.6742 is 567% not 56.7%, no? Your numbers seeGlenn D. Rudolph-12/10/1997
243 TD, I agree they don't usually exceed. They seem to nail their numbers wijoemjo-12/10/1997
242 BTW, the pulse checks i've done indicate that this is not an upside surprisTrader Dave-12/10/1997
241 Jas, Frustrated but patient I hope. If so you are the same as me. I really wjoemjo-12/10/1997
240 I agree with Todd. And 5.6742 is 567% not 56.7%, no? Your numbers seem to be jas cooper-12/10/1997
239 Glenn, 5.7% is 1.057 times 1.057 NOT, 1.57 times 1.57 toddjoemjo-12/10/1997
238 Jas, Take 1.57 times 1.57. Take the product and multiply that by 1.57 and thenGlenn D. Rudolph-12/10/1997
237 A couple of catalysts for this stock: it is being sold for tax reasons and thaRon Kory-12/9/1997
236 I'm confused here, too. What's all this fourth factorial stuff? If you jas cooper-12/9/1997
235 <i>I'm not in INSS yet, I can't think of what a catalyst wGlenn D. Rudolph-12/9/1997
234 The reason I ask is to see if that's relevant for sequential growth. BTW, Trader Dave-12/9/1997
233 <i>I don't know the math, but I do know the finance. A 5.7% sequentiaGlenn D. Rudolph-12/9/1997
232 I don't know the math, but I do know the finance. A 5.7% sequential growthTrader Dave-12/9/1997
231 <i>So, 5.7% a quarter annualized = a 24.8% growth rate</i> I belieGlenn D. Rudolph-12/9/1997
230 I hope we are starting with same number. 1.057 to the fourth = 1.248 So, 5.7%joemjo-12/8/1997
229 <i>Please explain. I still get 24.8</i> Hmmm..I still get 56%. PleGlenn D. Rudolph-12/8/1997
228 Now that you have read the previous post wondering why it is there, let me expljoemjo-12/8/1997
227 KANSAS CITY, Mo., July 21, 1997 -- Sprint (www.sprint.com) today joemjo-12/8/1997
226 Please explain. I still get 24.8 Toddjoemjo-12/8/1997
225 <i>That is worse than I thought. 5.7% sequential growth is 25% annual groGlenn D. Rudolph-12/7/1997
224 Glenn, I think your 6-30-97 number is incorrect. 4th qtr 6/30 REVENUE $30,joemjo-12/7/1997
223 That is worse than I thought. 5.7% sequential growth is 25% annual growth. Thjoemjo-12/7/1997
222 <i>If your mean the analyzed rate based on the sequential quarters, then Glenn D. Rudolph-12/7/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News