SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Young and Older Folk Portfolio
An SI Board Since April 2021
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
28258 496 0 SLV
Emcee:  chowder Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
24688RE: WTRG actually declined on the merger news. Ok I'll sit on my hands witmacbolan-January 4
24687RE: I gave you a shout out on Thunders Blog for that Rational Optimist post OHHmacbolan-January 4
24686Sorry, what is an RO? In my experience RO means reverse osmosis...or Range Offimacbolan-January 4
24685You're right about the price action.... My bad (Will teach me to verify someInDivGrowthWeTrust1January 4
24684Re: If the deal collapses, WTRG might drop the 10% it popped on the merger newsSeeksQuality4January 4
24683re: WTRG and AWK I agree. My default in these situations is wait for the dust tR.Daneel.Olivaw-January 4
24682re: WTRG and AWK I considered investing in WTRG with the merger in mind, that wInDivGrowthWeTrust2January 4
24681I recall when Tesla was first introducing FSD, they were talking about out how iCharliebrown72113January 4
24680<<Ten years ago, in 2016, Tesla produced a video to highlight their self-dSmart_Asset2January 4
24679Thank you SQ, yes it has come a long way from the initial version, but there areQTI on SI4January 4
24678re: WTRG and AWK (from the Dark Side!) Researching water utilities, WTRG and AR.Daneel.Olivaw2January 4
24677Impressive results, QTI, that version did an excellent job of characterizing theSeeksQuality-January 4
24676Re. I guess the take away is that ChatGPT might not be 100% reliable when havingR.Daneel.Olivaw5January 4
24675Re. I guess the take away is that ChatGPT might not be 100% reliable when havinQTI on SI5January 4
24674Re: Waymo One of the nuances that often gets lost in the discussion... The succSeeksQuality14January 4
24673Trying my best to be an RO... This is my fav from the email. <<3. “The fSmart_Asset6January 4
24672re: to have no more than 5% of my invested cash in any single stock. I've bInDivGrowthWeTrust2January 4
24671SQ: Sometimes we get so close to our portfolios that we cannot see the forest thdan19443January 4
24670re: The Rational Optimist Society For an interesting read on a Sunday. This alwR.Daneel.Olivaw5January 4
24669Edit to the previous moves: Fully eliminating RTX (now the largest sale) and addSeeksQuality-January 4
24668Trims in decreasing order of value: AAPL (closing out a CC option), BRK.B, ACN,SeeksQuality4January 4
24667With all due respect, I believe that these ChatGPT evaluations are in some senseSeeksQuality9January 4
24666re: ChatGPT might not be 100% reliable when having it evaluate my portfolio.R.Daneel.Olivaw3January 4
24665Slogging through a plan for portfolio adjustments to take things in the directioSeeksQuality12January 4
24664re: what worries me for 2026 Two quotes: Bruce Mehlman's 6 Chart-Sunday, JR.Daneel.Olivaw1January 4
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):