SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
LSI Corporation
An SI Board Since October 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
25814 176 0 LSI
Emcee:  Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
24689I think you are better off waiting until accounting snafus at at least one majorsea_biscuit-2/4/2002
24688Have I thrown you this thought before? I think the way to play this is put in aTaut Knot-2/4/2002
24687So, Andy, how is your "buy" signal working out? This is what I feelsea_biscuit-2/4/2002
24686Andy: Sorry about the multiple replies. But just wanted to add another thoughtsea_biscuit-1/30/2002
24685Yep. You can pay too much for anything. Even for an ASIC which paves the inforsea_biscuit-1/30/2002
24684"exactly reproducing that scandal" ..tulips, ASIC's, it's allTaut Knot-1/30/2002
24683Addi, you may not want to live in the past. However, the scamsters don't misea_biscuit-1/29/2002
24682Thanks, Andy. A 300% cumulative return over 18 years would be an annualized retsea_biscuit-1/28/2002
24681No DWB, I won't rub it in. You were gracious enough to volunteer that inforsea_biscuit-1/28/2002
24680Congrats Dipy, You can now consider our 1 year contest over, since GX filed forDWB-1/28/2002
24679Dipy, In calculating a rate of return of 6.3%, I believe you were summing up toAndy M.-1/28/2002
24678And one more thing. Upon a second reading of DWB's quote from Dessauer, I usea_biscuit-1/27/2002
24677<i>"Those stocks went down and stayed down for 20 years or more beforsea_biscuit-1/27/2002
24676DWB, Before we let your post egg on Dipy, let's consider what this statemenAndy M.-1/26/2002
24675Finally had the time to track this down... <i>Is there even one tech stocDWB-1/25/2002
24674I'm not FEELING a lot of love here.Taut Knot-1/24/2002
24673<i>Your above statement already assumes that one of these big tech companisea_biscuit-1/24/2002
24672Andy: Long-term, I am as pessimistic as I was in Sept. IOW, there won't bsea_biscuit-1/24/2002
24671No, Dipy, at the absolute bottom you didn't say the markets were oversold. Andy M.-1/24/2002
24670<i>...an expression of pessimism of comparable intensity which Dipy made osea_biscuit-1/24/2002
24669<i>Dipy, surely you are not claiming that you can predict QQQ 5 years aheasea_biscuit-1/24/2002
24668<i>The question, though, right now, is when to sell. </i> This is sea_biscuit-1/24/2002
24667The "Dipy Indicator" is still functioning just fine. In this new tradAndy M.-1/24/2002
24666"Anybody who buys and holds, especially the QQQs, is going to be a loser ovtelecomguy-1/24/2002
24665And any relief rally will be short-lived, given the very low VIX and VXN readingsea_biscuit-1/23/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News