SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
A CENTURY OF LIONS/THE 20TH CENTURY TOP 100
An SI Board Since October 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
3246 12 0
Emcee:  Neocon Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2471 Just wait 'til sandintoes gets through with you! LOL! Edwarda-2/3/2000
2470 I never thought of that!! Now, we'll have to think of someone with a <Bsandintoes-2/3/2000
2469 I am beyond vanity.....LOL!Neocon-2/3/2000
2468 You do realize what this must be doing for Neo's vanity! LOL! Edwarda-2/3/2000
2467 You are both right...I wasn't thinking of it that way, since you both read Neocon-2/1/2000
2466 Ya, you say that over here... Over there you said she was right....I'm stosandintoes-2/1/2000
2465 It's probably worth noting that the two authors would surely have been vastRaymond Clutts-2/1/2000
2464 Very good answer, indeed. I will ponder in order to make a more considered respNeocon-2/1/2000
2463 I'd begin by saying that I think the criticism of Starship Troopers is mispRaymond Clutts-2/1/2000
2462 Close enough, I admit, especially when my weight was down.....I am not as prissNeocon-2/1/2000
2461 A very eloquent defense of your position. I am not a science fiction fan, but hNeocon-2/1/2000
2460 Sorry I had to scoot abruptly...I did not have time to check into it, so I willNeocon-2/1/2000
2459 You have to come over and tell us who YOU think you are....Edwarda and I are hasandintoes-1/31/2000
2458 Still in the mood to listen, huh? Okay, let's throw it out and start all osandintoes-1/31/2000
2457 OK then here are some of the reasons that I offer in support of Robert A. HeinlRaymond Clutts-1/31/2000
2456 Nope. It's de minimus, but you are wrong. George and Bar headed Planned Zoltan!-1/31/2000
2455 Heinlein is superior, a libertarian to the max. Zoltan!-1/31/2000
2454 I believe that you are incorrect, but I will check on it.....Neocon-1/31/2000
2453 As a sidelight, Darman used to boast about his SATs...LOL!...Bush pere had occaNeocon-1/31/2000
2452 That is true. I still have not decided to offer the current form of the list asNeocon-1/31/2000
2451 >><I>Bush had been pro- life all along</i> Nope. Reagan reqZoltan!-1/31/2000
2450 Well, the Media also chose sides. With Bush, unless he agreed with the Dems inZoltan!-1/31/2000
2449 Yes, although I still owe you a justification for including Heinlein in lieu ofRaymond Clutts-1/31/2000
2448 I am happy to resolve matters in such a manner<VBG>.....Neocon-1/31/2000
2447 Agreed and the Court has at last begun to make some incremental progress in ackRaymond Clutts-1/31/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):