SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Incyte (INCY)
An SI Board Since January 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3202 131 0 INCY
Emcee:  scaram(o)uche Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2477quantman-12/31/2009
2476Biomaven: 1. Check out the Institutional Holdings Filings for the last qtr, parquantman712/31/2009
2475Long ago, I noticed that selling in VPHM was irrational, that more shares where scaram(o)uche-12/31/2009
2474Duh! You, for some reason, always read collusion into my posts, and that sets yscaram(o)uche-12/31/2009
2473Let me provide my own analysis of INCY's stock price moves. When a developmBiomaven212/31/2009
2472What did the offering before the last go out at? $7.90, or something like that?scaram(o)uche-12/31/2009
2471>> We KNOW that legitimate biotechs are gone from the list << And Nscaram(o)uche-12/31/2009
2470Sorry, Peter, didn't mean to be flippant with the "wrong entity". scaram(o)uche-12/31/2009
2469"not now" but you denied that it was happening at all, until there wascaram(o)uche-12/31/2009
2468My point was that the $2 price was an anomaly as the market was in tethers akin quantman-12/30/2009
2467Naked shorting is a complex issue, and maybe this isn't the right thread to Biomaven-12/30/2009
2466He said "incy stock has quadrupled in under a year." Just eyeballing rkrw-12/30/2009
2465Sorry, chose the wrong entity. Don't buy your other argument.scaram(o)uche-12/30/2009
2464OT! <i>but my wife who is 25% Irish does so want to go back to Dublin agaThe Dodgy Ticker-12/30/2009
2463No. I had not finished my post. And, it was a true and sincere right-handed compquantman-12/30/2009
2462<i>Anyway, I do appreciate the value of many of your points, but do wish tThe Dodgy Ticker112/30/2009
2461Thanks, Biomaven. I do very much appreciate your tax input and your other generaquantman-12/30/2009
2460<i> 4) At the end of the day, the value in a stock will emerge independentThe Dodgy Ticker-12/30/2009
2459I certainly take your point with respect to small biotechs. But INCY, with a MC Biomaven-12/30/2009
2458Can anyone think of any reason why longs are required to report at 5% (and for cscaram(o)uche-12/30/2009
2457>> IF, after all this, we are still hanging in the $10-$12 range then thinscaram(o)uche-12/30/2009
2456>> At the end of the day, the value in a stock will emerge independently oscaram(o)uche-12/30/2009
2455LOL.... yeah, Peter, and from way back in the pre-reg sho day, naked shorting scaram(o)uche-12/30/2009
2454Couple of points: 1) The tax loss is of little value to a potential acquiror. TBiomaven212/30/2009
2453I think SAC got into trouble for insider trading or something or other earlier trkrw-12/30/2009
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News