SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
LSI Corporation
An SI Board Since October 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
25814 176 0 LSI
Emcee:  Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
24839Don't know Addi....just change the start of the thread and get it back to reSkywatcher-4/15/2002
24838Hey! If you guys keep buying at 15 and selling at 17, or buying at 14 and sellisea_biscuit-4/14/2002
24837IBM is one of those tech stocks that, while not totally worthless, is worth a losea_biscuit-4/14/2002
24836akmike: The portfolios are up there for your and everybody's perusal. P.S.sea_biscuit-4/14/2002
24835Well....the 15 is the target...but if all the indicators are still going down...Skywatcher-4/14/2002
24834Hello-I hope things are going well for you and your family. P. S. Dipy will chaakmike-4/14/2002
24833**Because the SEC has joined the Wall Street cheerleaders and issued a "Buyakmike-4/14/2002
24832Thank you, and I will check back in a year. HHJock Hutchinson-4/14/2002
24831OT: Addi, Btw, IBM will probably stabilize here for a while. Maybe even go up asea_biscuit-4/14/2002
24830Your expectation of the return of Nasdaq 5000 within about 3 1/2 years (i.e. thesea_biscuit-4/14/2002
24829Addi: For all your optimism, look at what your picks have done since 08/21/01 sea_biscuit-4/13/2002
24828Madam Hutchinson: As you will come to realize, our friend Dipy is a pessimist buu-4/13/2002
24827I have set up the two portfolios as of close Friday 04/12/02. Jock's New Pisea_biscuit-4/13/2002
24826Ma'am, why don't you simply request me to change the date? If I refusedsea_biscuit-4/13/2002
24825You truly are intellectually dishonest. At first, you ignore my husband's chJock Hutchinson-4/13/2002
24824Good morning, ma'am. I have set up the two portfolios as of the closing prisea_biscuit-4/13/2002
2482315 it is! I don't disagree with you on that buy point. But it seems like Taut Knot-4/13/2002
24822No problem. Let's pit the techs that Jock has picked against the "garbsea_biscuit-4/12/2002
24821Sir: You are intellectually dishonest. From April 6 2001, the date of your and mJock Hutchinson-4/12/2002
24820Andy: Looks like the latest IBM problem has blown over. So, a brand-new bull-msea_biscuit-4/11/2002
24819<i>I am willing to bet ( a bet which I cannot possibly pay off) that my cosea_biscuit-4/11/2002
24818I don't think this will have a real end until the people start regarding thesea_biscuit-4/11/2002
24817Wow, what a brutal day! Dipy's essential rightness is proven again, the IndAndy M.-4/11/2002
24816Addi: I <i>told</i> you about IBM a couple of months ago, and I <sea_biscuit-4/11/2002
24815Ah, some tech stocks are worthless and some others are worth a lot less. And losea_biscuit-4/10/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News