SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
ISCO-Illinois Superconductor
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
524 28 0 ISCO
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
249 Hi Ram Alas, I am a long suffering shareholder. I've owned this dog since Tbon-4/8/1999
248 ISCO's logic might be - if you don't sell you will be out of business sRam Seetharaman-4/6/1999
247 Ram: Have you read the 10K that the company just posted? They are again floatTbon-4/6/1999
246 They are all bottom fishers and bargain hunters. That is why they decide to risRam Seetharaman-4/1/1999
245 Hi Ram: I expect that ISCO will be in Ch. 11 or out of business by the end of Tbon-4/1/1999
244 How low will ISCO go! Here are earnings and they suck! 03/31 15:02 Illinois SuRam Seetharaman-3/31/1999
243 03/22 11:18 Key Industry Experts Join Integral Access Advisory Board Key InduRam Seetharaman-3/22/1999
242 Ram: Have you had any success finding out any info on who ISCO has partnered Tbon-2/4/1999
241 And I'm right in between. R Verchota-1/28/1999
240 Good idea! Information shopping on the internet and vendors will eventually revRam Seetharaman-1/28/1999
239 ISCO news is not with a cellular operator, it is with a cellular systems manufaR Verchota-1/28/1999
238 I think you are the one who is confused. You assume I meant you made a predictiERM-1/28/1999
237 In my post, I said <i>His/her comment about predicting a stock price wasAlan Lee-1/28/1999
236 I never posted next stop is 4 to 5. Someone else did. Why don't you check bTarheel-1/27/1999
235 ERM's comments were directed towards these statements from your posts: &lAlan Lee-1/27/1999
234 What are you talking about? I never predicted anything. You seem very confusedTarheel-1/27/1999
233 Let us see if it can keep the price above $ 1 1/2 for the next five days. OtherRam Seetharaman-1/27/1999
232 It does not say they have become a vendor. It says they have become an approvedERM-1/27/1999
231 ERM, How could you possibly take that as overstating news? The article statesTarheel-1/27/1999
230 With all due respect, I think you're overstating the news. They simply becaERM-1/27/1999
229 ERM, There was news today. They announced some deal with a major cellular custTarheel-1/27/1999
228 Any particular reason, or just optimism? ERM-1/27/1999
227 Next stop is 41/2 to 5 Get aboard JERRY-1/27/1999
226 Luis: Well it is 1999 - where is the announcement from Dr. Laves on the OEM dTbon-1/7/1999
225 ISCO is again losing volume and heading south close to $ 1. I would be impresseRam Seetharaman-12/22/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News