SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
LSI Corporation
An SI Board Since October 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
25814 176 0 LSI
Emcee:  Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
24939Dipy, One thing I know for certain and that is, when both sides start talking tuu-5/8/2002
24938I hope you are enjoying the new bull-market! It is a very good thing that the sea_biscuit-5/8/2002
24937Well, Andy, if you still think that nothing's wrong in "earnings land&qsea_biscuit-5/8/2002
24936No, I agree if earnings aren't rising fast enough to justify the p/e, youAndy M.-5/8/2002
24935<i>To me, this does involve taking earnings into account, so maybe we don&sea_biscuit-5/8/2002
24934Dipy, To me, this does involve taking earnings into account, so maybe we donAndy M.-5/8/2002
24933The first sentence of the following article says a lot about the earnings reportsea_biscuit-5/7/2002
24932<i> I think it's just silly and stubborn on your part to try to decoupsea_biscuit-5/7/2002
24931Dipy, Being able to pay dividends means companies are making profits. With nonAndy M.-5/7/2002
24930<i> In 1932, you could say the same thing about overhead resistances and ssea_biscuit-5/7/2002
24929Dipy, Technically, there's no distinguishing between "the trend is youAndy M.-5/7/2002
24928<i>In any event, just my observation - which of course may all be wrong! &sea_biscuit-5/7/2002
24927Andy: Maybe you missed it, but the wisdom that I was referring to was in the fosea_biscuit-5/7/2002
24926Dipy: To be pessimistic and giving some analysis on the future of stocks/marketuu-5/6/2002
24925Multiple ironies in your response to E, Dipy. Elated to have her agree with youAndy M.-5/6/2002
24924Well, well, well -- the "Buy" rating didn't work! Looks like the sea_biscuit-5/6/2002
24923Hi Addi, I have kept the LSI thread bookmarked, so I have followed some of yourE. Graphs-5/6/2002
24922Ms. E: Thanks for the excellent analysis. Your posting is sheer wisdom! It masea_biscuit-5/6/2002
24921Dipy, That's what I'm seeing in the major chart. I don't follow theE. Graphs-5/6/2002
24920Addi: The monthly "strength" period is now coming to an end. Some &qsea_biscuit-5/6/2002
24919Ms. E: How far low do you think we will have to go on the Nasdaq? I would put sea_biscuit-5/6/2002
24918Dipy, I have learned so much, and I'm still learning. The best time to buE. Graphs-5/6/2002
24917<i>...being an old timer Silicon Valley guy, his picking of the shares havsea_biscuit-5/4/2002
24916addi,re:"2000 peak...". Ok. It's been a loong couple of years.John Chen-5/4/2002
24915John, Correction: USA'peak was 2000 NOT 2001! (not that it matters, but jusuu-5/4/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News