SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
OILEX (OLEX)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4276 3 0 OLEX
Emcee:  Eric Maggard Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2501 Well, Ajay, you were right. My math was flawed. I forgot to add in the 10% commPrudent Investor-1/13/1998
2500 An interesting point: there is a lot more room to short a $.90 (or $.80, $.70, Prudent Investor-1/13/1998
2499 Sammy, I would not call management a bunch of "crooks" ... ie,it is nJim Kay-1/13/1998
2498 Well I hope some of u took my advice and shorted this dog at 5 cents or higher.G-1/13/1998
2497 Well PI,I said .o3 a week or two ago-we are there,but I have decided not to buyDitchdigger-1/13/1998
2496 Ajay, I find it very interesting that you never seem to post any facts or inforPrudent Investor-1/13/1998
2495 Why are you so against PI, OFW and anyone else that has the intelligence and foSammyW-1/13/1998
2494 Ajay, way to face some of the facts here and personally attack one of the naysaEric Maggard-1/13/1998
2493 Ajay,perhaps as someone suggested,this company is in the "paper business. Ditchdigger-1/13/1998
2492 This must have taken a lot of time to type out Pru. Glad you have so much timeAjay-1/13/1998
2491 TO THE BARON: With all due respect, Mr. Baron, since you've used this threOFW-1/13/1998
2490 PI: I'm going to withhold further comment until the company responds to myOFW-1/13/1998
2489 PI... you are so cynical... don't forget you need assets... didn't I reJim Kay-1/13/1998
2488 Ed, you are right. The amended S8 does say that the offering is concluded. If tPrudent Investor-1/13/1998
2487 Based on 3/64 conversion 3,739,316.2 shares..DD doesn't factor in discount Ditchdigger-1/13/1998
2486 Offie, "There you go again" (to quote one of my favorite Presidents)Prudent Investor-1/13/1998
2485 Offie-check out the volume the week after the placement-should be able to get aDitchdigger-1/13/1998
2484 I have e-mailed the company asking for a clarification of the debenture filingsOFW-1/13/1998
2483 Ed, My guess is,they used the term amended to reflect that fact that the placemDitchdigger-1/13/1998
2482 Edward's right. The amt was for $175k and that's it (imo from the 8-K&Ajay-1/13/1998
2481 Mr Shapiro, It's been a number of years since my last math class, but by myJohn Rowe-1/13/1998
2480 PI, That is from the ORIGINAL 8-K. My quote was from the AMENDED 8-K. The edward shapiro-1/13/1998
2479 Ed, The above quote is not correct. The correct statement is: "As of DecePrudent Investor-1/13/1998
2478 DD, That is how I read it too. I haven't been able to get into any of theEric Maggard-1/13/1998
2477 Offie,I can't get into the site at the moment,from what you posted,sounds tDitchdigger-1/13/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News