SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Incyte (INCY)
An SI Board Since January 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3202 131 0 INCY
Emcee:  scaram(o)uche Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2502>> Closing in on the conversion price of the 2011 debt of $11.22 incidentascaram(o)uche-1/6/2010
2501No more rants once Incyte hits Quantman's targets :) Closing in on the conrkrw-1/6/2010
2500Hey, Tom.... you seem to really enjoy playing along! Thought you might want tscaram(o)uche-1/6/2010
2499Well, something is holding the stock down. If not the shorts, what else? Somethitom pope-1/6/2010
2498It's just snark, and not directed at you.nigel bates-1/6/2010
2497Huh? I have no idea what you are referring to.DewDiligence_on_SI-1/6/2010
2496I’m not sure which is funnier: that you believe that TA stuff, or that you thinkDewDiligence_on_SI-1/6/2010
2495Check out the 2 Year Chart. There may be Cup and Handle Formation setting up on quantman-1/5/2010
2494Israeli Medical Research Offers New Hope for Treating Childhood Leukemia prnewswBiomaven11/5/2010
2493<i>I've been a professional biotech investor since '95. Exclusiveltom pope-1/4/2010
2492<i>>You're just pissed because you lost two nights of sleep, tryingDewDiligence_on_SI-1/4/2010
2491Then someone changed your post after you put it up. Because it now reads..... scaram(o)uche41/4/2010
2490Well, there's no cost to me because I can't get any :-(DewDiligence_on_SI-1/4/2010
2489OT Cost to borrow MNKD today quoted at 75%.rkrw-1/4/2010
2488<i>>…please explain how shorting without limits could benefit everybodyDewDiligence_on_SI21/4/2010
2487<i>I’m not afraid of naked shorting, nor do I think it is wrong. If the deThe Dodgy Ticker-1/4/2010
2486>If you're not afraid of [naked shorting], can you still think it's wDewDiligence_on_SI11/4/2010
2485I was saying it is wrong, reprehensible and to be condemned, but I don't cartom pope11/3/2010
2484<i>or did I misphrase my sentence?</i> It sounded to me as though yThe Dodgy Ticker-1/3/2010
2483I agree with you, or did I misphrase my sentence? Naked shorting is wrong, in altom pope-1/3/2010
2482What does a petulant personal attack say about the person launching it..........quantman41/3/2010
2481<i>It's not whether it's wrong (sure it is), it's whether it&#The Dodgy Ticker11/3/2010
2480It's not whether it's wrong (sure it is), it's whether it's effetom pope-1/3/2010
2479If you're not afraid of it, can you still think it's wrong?The Dodgy Ticker-1/3/2010
2478I know a shrink who has a thriving practice specializing in treating the fear ofDewDiligence_on_SI31/3/2010
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News