SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Young and Older Folk Portfolio
An SI Board Since April 2021
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
28102 496 0 SLV
Emcee:  chowder Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
25026Re: Interesting seeing DG on that list. I had DG in the Young Folk Portfoliochowder-January 11
25025Re: Bruce Mehlman's Six Chart Sunday... Great Free Read! Bruce Mehlman-SubstR.Daneel.Olivaw2January 11
25024Re: Not sure why value line saying almost 4%? Seems a bit off. Maybe anything ovR.Daneel.Olivaw1January 11
25023Re: DUK I made the same decision regarding DUK and SO late last year. I hold AER.Daneel.Olivaw1January 11
25022So, what are individuals focused on rather than buying stocks where the dividendcemanuel1January 11
25021" Avoid stocks where the dividend is the thesis. Own stocks where the diviHaz211January 11
25020Interesting seeing DG on that list. I owned it before, roughly broke even over tcemanuel-January 11
25019I don't own any of them now. But I have owned several in the past. T - evencemanuel-January 11
25018Re: Not sure why value line saying almost 4%? Seems a bit off. Maybe anythingchowder1January 10
25017No, I don't think so. DUK normally raises dividend in July. The Jan 6 divideQTI on SI4January 10
25016I think DUK just recently raised their dividend (January 6, 2026), so maybe thatB.K.Myers-January 10
25015Regarding DUK, SSD says the current yield on DUK is 3.65%, but value line is sDividendretire2-January 10
25014I see nothing wrong with making DUK a core utility holding. I own DUK and SO andchowder4January 10
25013If anyone is up to sharing, can I get any thoughts on have DUKE as a core utiliDividendretire2-January 10
25012All of that makes perfect sense to me, even if I still hold a few of those. GoodSeeksQuality-January 10
25011Interesting answer, thank you for sharing your model.SeeksQuality-January 10
25010I know you don't like AI very much, but I asked Gemini anyway. I asked: Ichowder6January 10
25009I’ve been experimenting with a small variation of the as10675 quality screener tweathersystems1January 10
25008RE: Looking back over past decade or two, any consumer packaged goods companies jritz02January 10
25007I’d like to know also. I have a decent amount Of O only at the moment and wouldDividendretire22January 10
25006I do appreciate both yours and SQ input. And others. Some very good points are mDividendretire23January 10
25005SQ, I hope you don't mind, but in an effort to improve the DSM model, I ran QTI on SI3January 10
25004re. Used to fall for the yield (T etc) and more often than not gave up on the QTI on SI-January 10
25003I will add that I feel apartment reits are well priced at this point which is whJust Fine2January 10
25002Hi SQ. I’ll give an opinion on your 12% question - I think your seven selectionsJust Fine2January 10
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News