SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Speedfam [SFAM] Lovers Unite !
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3736 42 0 SFAM
Emcee:  AJ Berger Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2511 In addition to SFAM retesting its recent low, I believe the market will retest Harry Ehrlich-12/30/1997
2510 This was a nice move today. Let's keep it going, the semi's arn't dCraig Rogers-12/30/1997
2509 Edward, do you know whether there is an internet site that displays a stock'Brian F.-12/30/1997
2508 No news that I know of as of now. It is good to see the larger blocks coming iEdward H. Hotard-12/30/1997
2507 Edward, Today looks like a good strong move on what may be end up as above averTEColeman-12/30/1997
2506 Well seeing as how nobody listened to them and the stock went up I suppose theyepicure-12/30/1997
2505 Yes. They cut them to a 5 last week, and raised them to a 4 this week.Edward H. Hotard-12/30/1997
2504 Didn't Zacks just cut them to a sell, like a week or two ago?epicure-12/30/1997
2503 Zacks has upgraded to a 4. There were two recommendations after the PrudentialEdward H. Hotard-12/30/1997
2502 It looks to me like we have about 3 point risk on downside vs at least 12 pointJohn Brickman-12/29/1997
2501 I watched the stock closely today. Up on small trades until about 12:00 when sEdward H. Hotard-12/29/1997
2500 I agree Harry. I am on the sidelines and would like to re-enter in the worst waMULIFAT-12/29/1997
2499 I'm on the sidelines, but I watch SFAM every day. I plan to buy back in, bHarry Ehrlich-12/29/1997
2498 They liked SFAM in the morning but not in the afternoon. craigCraig Rogers-12/29/1997
2497 Very fine analysis Edward. Good work. Thanks a bunch. I'm in for the long tDennis G.-12/28/1997
2496 The Southwest estimate for 2/98 is actually 0.47, not 0.52. The Southwest estiEdward H. Hotard-12/28/1997
2495 My best guess. The most recent earnings estimates from Prudential and SouthweEdward H. Hotard-12/28/1997
2494 wmf, -you wrote- <i>"Even the Korean companies will have to buy CMPGuinnessGuy-12/27/1997
2493 Craig, Merill did not downgrade SFAM at all but they did downgrade some other wmf-12/27/1997
2492 To All: Found this news of interest on the CYMI board. Notice reference to ToshJohn Chalker-12/27/1997
2491 H. James, I think the 50% plus number used by Fleming is misleading. He must beJohn Chalker-12/27/1997
2490 No Richard, I'm only suggesting that these Eqp Mfg's probably, havenH James Morris-12/26/1997
2489 Craig, Go back a few days on these posts and see a reply from MR SAM re the ZaMULIFAT-12/26/1997
2488 To all: Any thoughts on Zacks rating SFAM a strong sell last week? What does hCraig Rogers-12/26/1997
2487 Hey H. James: Where have you been? NVLS has dropped from 66 to 32 and AMAT hasrichard stout-12/25/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):