SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Discussion Thread
An SI Board Since May 2008
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
3816 14 0
Emcee:  one_less Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2516Tim what stats are you talking about...you have not posted any. as to anecdotesc.hinton-11/6/2008
2515Knowing people at that time, isn't really very relevant. Your relying on TimF-11/6/2008
2514re"Pulling it down sooner, and probably in a more severe way wouldn't hc.hinton-11/6/2008
2513tim then dont use a quote ...provide a link to a policy statement of hers.c.hinton-11/6/2008
2512how about just some from today on this thread? all i see is unsupported uninforc.hinton-11/6/2008
2511tim ...i guess you never knew many people from that era and social class. i didc.hinton-11/6/2008
2510 Just look at my profile. You'll find tens of thousands.TimF-11/6/2008
2509 Its a ridiculous question. No quote from anyone would indicate that they are TimF-11/6/2008
2508Tim please post alink to some supported statement you have made.c.hinton-11/6/2008
2507I take it you cant cite anything she said to support your contention that she ic.hinton-11/6/2008
2506 Nonsense.TimF-11/6/2008
2505<I> how many over grown polo fields do you see today? </i> Who caTimF-11/6/2008
2504BUT TIM, ALL YOUR POSTS ARE BASED ON "a bunch of assumed but unstated premic.hinton-11/6/2008
2503 Picking out isolated words wouldn't be very meaningful in this context, buTimF-11/6/2008
2502 Please develop an actual relevant argument. Just posting a small part of one,TimF-11/6/2008
2501 A balanced budget would more appropriately be called a fiscal reason not an ecTimF-11/6/2008
2500tim ...how many over grown polo fields do you see today? my dad was a banker(JPc.hinton-11/6/2008
2499 <I> the 50s were not a golden age for the rich. </i> "Not aTimF-11/6/2008
2498<i>"What if the problem is multiples of the entire World GDP? "Oeconomicus211/6/2008
2497re"Palin showed a better grasp of the issues than Biden in the debate. Althc.hinton-11/6/2008
2496how is that?..... where do you keep your wealth...under the mattress?c.hinton-11/6/2008
2495Re"Tax changes get put in place for political reasons" gee i thought c.hinton-11/6/2008
2494Tim,in the 50s the mega rich had already been brought down low by high taxes andc.hinton-11/6/2008
2493 Tax policy alters investment decisions. Of course I'm aware of that. ItsTimF-11/6/2008
2492PS one circumstance were tax hikes can help is in balancing a budget that risksc.hinton-11/6/2008
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News