SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
The Enron Scandal - Unmoderated
An SI Board Since January 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3602 25 0 ENE
Emcee:  Jorj X Mckie Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
252but....it never got de-regulated. It was the partial de-regulation that positionJorj X Mckie-1/15/2002
251<i>putting California in the energy shitcan</i> That would have beenTigerPaw-1/15/2002
250I am against State run power too. I am all for de-regulation. The way that the &Jorj X Mckie-1/15/2002
249<i>Enron is fully bloated.</i> Not any more. <i>What shocked Lazarus_Long-1/15/2002
248This meeting captures the moment that Enron's goose was cooked. sfgate.com TigerPaw-1/15/2002
247You see clearly! <g>Carolyn-1/15/2002
246String him up.... it'll teach him a lesson.... ShootieShoot1st-1/15/2002
245Yes, Carolyn, I am a kind man. I always take time to try to save the politicallShoot1st-1/15/2002
244"some"? *all*Jorj X Mckie-1/15/2002
243Maybe I misinterpreted some of what you said. It appears to me that the indepenLazarus_Long-1/15/2002
242Is there any reason, 'stockman scott,' that you don't... ...post thbonnuss_in_austin-1/15/2002
241<<What's the source, 'stockman scott?'>> bia: Check thstockman_scott-1/15/2002
240What's the source, 'stockman scott?' Post the link you cut/paste frbonnuss_in_austin-1/15/2002
239Andersen: Partner Destroyed Enron Files Jan 15 8:03pm ET By Leslie Adler KLP-1/15/2002
238That is very sensitive and unselfish of you, Shootie - always taking care of theCarolyn-1/15/2002
237I could be more eloquent..... but never though a demodork could understand a moShoot1st-1/15/2002
236SEC's Pitt slams talk of recusal in Enron probe Tuesday January 15, 8:13 pmstockman_scott-1/15/2002
235LOL! Well put!Carolyn-1/15/2002
234Enron is fully bloated. What shocked me was that Enron was on the NYSE and not Patricia Trinchero-1/15/2002
233Not everybody is as smart as us...... face it...we are really bright.... demodShoot1st-1/15/2002
232Inept I can accept. But no one in his right mind could swallow that stuff.Carolyn-1/15/2002
231She was probably proud of it.Carolyn-1/15/2002
230I see.... not a nice thing to do.... as far as my "IGNORES" go.... Shoot1st-1/15/2002
229No, it was Patricia's original post....not mine...Give her credit where credKLP-1/15/2002
228OMG!!! I only have 2! I am impressed! Did you see this site that KLP posted: dCarolyn-1/15/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News