SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Leap Wireless International (LWIN)
An SI Board Since September 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2737 62 0 LWIN
Emcee:  J.B.C. Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2537In San Diego, we have been paying "Zone 3" Local calling charges for mRalphCramden-10/21/2002
2536AP story on "reverse billing" / wireless "number portability"Jon Koplik-10/19/2002
2535The upbeat opinion provided by the market maker (that is itself under significanverdad-10/17/2002
2534cnet.com Wireless net adds information J.P. Morgan sees slower growth but bettengineer-10/16/2002
2533Indeed. Reliability of information source referenced may be questionable (as stverdad-10/15/2002
2532As far as I know, White has always been a buyer of LWIN. I nasdaq.com`&segolfinvestor-10/15/2002
2531It might be interesting to know Harvey White's precise LWIN trading history.verdad-10/14/2002
2530<i> The shareholder's have really been let down by LWIN's poor manpcstel-10/14/2002
2529Be sure and say a prayer for LWIN, because that's about the only chance it hgolfinvestor-10/13/2002
2528General Thoughts on LWIN: Anyone besides Jon and Maurice still here? Here are Michael Allard-10/12/2002
2527Leap delisting hearing Nov. 14, 2002 forbes.com Leap Wireless appeals Nasdaq dJon Koplik-10/11/2002
2526There is one thing we can all agree on and that is the price of LWIN stock.verdad-10/10/2002
2525Doesn't the USA have payment direct from RoamAD or Cricket Communications cyMaurice Winn-10/10/2002
2524Verdad, good point. <<i> LWIN has done its job, it has protected QCOM Maurice Winn-10/10/2002
2523MCG: Their stock is now under $2,800,000 in value, (non-tradeable of course). Michael Allard-10/10/2002
2522The article and discussion of the lawsuit are compelling; however, due to its daverdad-10/10/2002
2521SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE Mar 14, 2001 Two weeks after settling a class-action laverdad-10/10/2002
2520<I> As for the 2,000 employees that initially considered joining the lawsupcstel-10/10/2002
2519Regarding the precise facts of the QCOM infra division employee class action lawverdad-10/9/2002
2518The infrastructure division was sold in March 1999 which I don't think qualiRalphCramden-10/9/2002
2517I believe STRONGLY that you confused and delusional. The employees of ERICY thatengineer-10/9/2002
2516Wasn't there recently a class action lawsuit brought against QCOM involving verdad-10/8/2002
2515What does the profit picture look like? Has LWIN kept costs in line or have opeverdad-10/8/2002
2514Your question is a little biasing. Yes indeed, if a company truly has more debtRalphCramden-10/7/2002
2513Isn't market cap an arbitrary figure when considering the price of the stockverdad-10/7/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News