SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Advanced Micro vs Intel (AMD / INTC)
An SI Board Since March 2007
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2596 38 0 ^SOX
Emcee:  rupert1 Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2546Big losses projected at struggling AMD ---------------------------------------Elmer Phud-1/10/2008
2545<i>It was my understanding that the Fab would be converted to 300mm incremElmer Phud-1/10/2008
2544<i>It will be 2009 before the other fab is converted.</i> It was myinex-1/10/2008
2543<i>Now, with products which don't compete directly with Intel, AMD canchipguy-1/10/2008
2542<i>Just because AMD is not in a position to compete in the high end has noElmer Phud-1/10/2008
2541<i>They can't make money with an underperforming higher cost product iinex-1/10/2008
2540<i>And I'm under the impression that this segment accounts for the majElmer Phud-1/9/2008
2539Ephud, <i>The chipsets and graphics come from foundries which have to makinex-1/9/2008
2538"It seems as though the same type of irrational selling that occurred in 20Jim McMannis-1/9/2008
2537Scott - I disagree with your analysis. AMD only has 65nm capacity. They arenElmer Phud-1/9/2008
2536CJ, It seems as though the same type of irrational selling that occurred in 200inex-1/9/2008
2535Another slip for Barfelona? <i>Translation: It was known already that thElmer Phud-1/9/2008
2534Is AMD admitting to another slip in their 45nm process? <i>He also said tElmer Phud-1/9/2008
2533"It would be naive to believe that a company the size of AMD could digest acombjelly-1/8/2008
2532Tim, <i>but AMD does have higher costs and debt than in the past.</i&ginex-1/8/2008
2531<i>I hope that was speculative money you used.</i> Thanks, Ephud...inex-1/8/2008
2530 I don't think AMD is going under either, and you accurately point out a buTimF-1/8/2008
2529Well Scott you've been a good sport and I wish you luck. I hope that was speElmer Phud-1/8/2008
2528Again, Ephud, AMD taking on debt is old news... been doing that since the begiinex-1/8/2008
2527<i>AMD over its entire lifetime hasn't made a single net dollar.</iElmer Phud-1/8/2008
2526<i>However, many times in AMD's past they have been in much worse a pochipguy-1/8/2008
2525Take a look at AMD's debt load for starters.Elmer Phud-1/8/2008
2524Chipguy, I am willing to admit that a technical person is capable of drawing thinex-1/8/2008
2523LOL. Let me know when Cherry Sanders is buying. Getting down to his range. I'Jim McMannis-1/8/2008
2522You still long AMD?Elmer Phud-1/8/2008
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):