General Lithography | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
General Lithography

An SI Board Since December 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
1305	39	0

Emcee: Andrew Vance	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
255	Andrew, A couple more clues: 1. Don't forget the $1B SEC filing MU	Ian@SI	-	4/18/1997
254	I may have made too forceful a statement. It APPEARS as if it is out of mothbal	Andrew Vance	-	4/18/1997
253	Hello Andrew, I'm from the MU thread (I admit to being a bear) and I saw yo	mike iles	-	4/18/1997
252	Al, I hope you know that Andrew's secret to buying semiconductor stocks i	Jeffrey S. Mitchell	-	4/18/1997
251	Andrew: My thanks for your answer. Amazing. Send me your bill. Wally	WALLY THE SANDCRAB	-	4/18/1997
250	You always keep me on my feet and pose the thought provoking questions. So here	Andrew Vance	-	4/18/1997
249	Hello Andrew: I've got a question for you regarding Genus' recent news	WALLY THE SANDCRAB	-	4/18/1997
248	I have followed GGNS for years, going back to their silicide equipment back in	Andrew Vance	-	4/17/1997
247	Ho Andrew, since you seem interested in GGNS, what do you make of the latest n	spiny norman	-	4/17/1997
246	I am glad you made some money today and hope the rest pan out for you. I probab	Andrew Vance	-	4/17/1997
245	Followed your lead and hunch. Tally is below LRCX-15% NVLS-5% UTEK-EVEN SVGI-2	Al Jardy	-	4/17/1997
244	Hello Andrew, If you emailed the webmasters at SI, they might change the name	FJB	-	4/16/1997
243	On an upbeat note, a few observations tonight on one of your mentions (for the	wm sharp	-	4/16/1997
242	You point is well taken and should be re-iterated again. Options are vey high	Andrew Vance	-	4/16/1997
241	Andrew, Re: <i>I picked up some LRCX at 23 1/2 today and options for LR	Ian@SI	-	4/16/1997
240	See post #392 on the Ultratech Stepper thread which is linked below. This compa	Andrew Vance	-	4/16/1997
239	Andrew, I realize now may not be an ideal time to look into new companies/inve	jsabelko	-	4/16/1997
238	The signal this market sends to an impartial observer: INTC are uniquely compet	wm sharp	-	4/16/1997
237	I picked up some LRCX at 23 1/2 today and options for LRCX, SVGI, UTEK, and WFR	Andrew Vance	-	4/16/1997
236	AV - Very grateful for your analysis - er, psychoanalysis - of this grim situat	wm sharp	-	4/16/1997
235	Andrew, Are you trying to generate "irrational exhuberance" in these	Cary Salsberg	-	4/16/1997
234	Paul - message was received. Actually , I got 2 copies. I wasn't on threads	Andrew Vance	-	4/16/1997
233	Robert-excellent post. The following excerpt is outstanding. "Current res	Andrew Vance	-	4/16/1997
232	Let's attack them one at a time. 1. LRCX/ONTK gets decimated for a lousy 6	Andrew Vance	-	4/16/1997
231	Yea, AV, I see what you mean. I gotta admit I'm having a tough time sorting	wm sharp	-	4/16/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):