DACQ - Here we go again? | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks
DACQ - Here we go again?

An SI Board Since June 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
3501	11	0	DACQ

Emcee: Don Lachot	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
2551	As I recall, we are supposed to get some news about financing in the first quar	Fred Rollins	-	1/9/1997
2550	Perhaps if you had paid a little more attention to the "cynical" AOL	Michael Davis	-	1/9/1997
2549	Amen! Anyone who posts his belief in a stock based on a naive belief in h	Johnny X	-	1/9/1997
2548	"Brace Yourself" HAHA . Canoga if I had your attitude about trustin	Findit	-	1/9/1997
2547	Dr. Ray, et al, Did anyone else feel that last little glimmer of false hope sli	Donna Carey	-	1/9/1997
2546	Gosh Glenn I have not heard from you. Whats your spin on this situation?	Dr. Raymond E. Novak II	-	1/9/1997
2545	Wow....Very Well Said. Thanks for the Recap and Enjoy the New Year. Phil	Phil Wilson	-	1/9/1997
2544	I think we ( or most of all) have been duped... again... in our search for the	J. A. Pina, Jr.	-	1/9/1997
2543	Ray, if these people have been dishonest then they need to be nailed to the wal	John Fairbanks	-	1/9/1997
2542	Thanks for the great analysis. Does anyone have objections NOW to having some i	Dr. Raymond E. Novak II	-	1/9/1997
2541	Dear Jim: And a happy New Year to you! Thank you so much for your thoughtful	Canoga Slim	-	1/9/1997
2540	Does anyone know about shell companies? I still hold a few measly shares (10,0	Johnny X	-	1/8/1997
2539	what's the point in selling for 1 cent ? those that are in this risky junk	taxgun	-	1/8/1997
2538	Yep. Looks like the MMs are trying to keep some volume -- I for one will never	John Fairbanks	-	1/8/1997
2537	Did anyone notice that the bid was increased at least twice today? It was .0100	Lee Kennedy	-	1/7/1997
2536	So basically they allowed you to sell it at .01 and then charged you the same a	John Fairbanks	-	1/7/1997
2535	It may have been a courtesy on the part of my broker, so I could take the write	Johnny X	-	1/7/1997
2534	We can sell shares for a defunct company? So what you are saying is that there	John Fairbanks	-	1/7/1997
2533	Yes, exactly. You can almost quote me on this one. -end-	Johnny X	-	1/7/1997
2532	>>As I understand it, the spread is not being limited; what will happen o	Donna Carey	-	1/7/1997
2531	As I understand it, the spread is not being limited; what will happen on Ja	Johnny X	-	1/7/1997
2530	Kind of makes you wonder does it not? Why would the MM's not want people to	Dr. Raymond E. Novak II	-	1/7/1997
2529	Gosh what a spread! .01 bid and .0175 ask?? That's paying almost twice as	John Fairbanks	-	1/7/1997
2528	Doc! If you read the past posts, you know that the only information I got was	Pami	-	1/5/1997
2527	Pam are you still a stock holder in this company? Or have you gone on to greene	Dr. Raymond E. Novak II	-	1/5/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):