SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Source Media SRCM
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3015 11 0 SRCM
Emcee:  Steve Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2565 08:23am EDT 2-Jun-99 SoundView Financial Group SNDVW ASDV GLW IATV <b>SRCSkip Jack-6/2/1999
2564 MW, Nice try with the Warren Buffet BS. Incidentally - do you know why this pPluvia-6/1/1999
2563 This statemnet is the most ridivculous statement I have ever read next to ABTlAnthony@Pacific-5/28/1999
2562 As usual SRCM is not even mentioned: "Companies Battle for Beachhead As TVSir Auric Goldfinger-5/27/1999
2561 The answer with the Tudor and BH/Gen RE filings is that they are short the debtSir Auric Goldfinger-5/27/1999
2560 <<Carefully leaving out certain details that would lead to the real truthMW-5/26/1999
2559 <<I never said Mr Buffet took srcm into his inner circle. I only reporteKevin Podsiadlik-5/26/1999
2558 <i>Regardless, ANOTHER FUND MGR, has bought stock in srcm.</i> MW David Penfield-5/26/1999
2557 I'll take a copy (fax: 630-990-9693). Thanks for offering. RazorRazorbak-5/26/1999
2556 <<A holding by a subsidiary of a company which was in turn bought by BerMW-5/26/1999
2555 <<I don't disbelieve you, I have a bloomberg as well and see them sitMW-5/26/1999
2554 I don't disbelieve you, I have a bloomberg as well and see them sitting theCMon-5/26/1999
2553 I'm not looking to imply anything. The form lists the client as Berkshire HMW-5/26/1999
2552 Good work Kevin. I found the same filing after MW reported that it was the GenDavid Penfield-5/26/1999
2551 Okay, SLIGHT difference there. <I>This</I> is what MW has been croKevin Podsiadlik-5/26/1999
2550 Hey Pal ; I don't give a rats ass whether you believe me or not. I don'MW-5/26/1999
2549 To jump in: It depends on what you mean by "Berkshire Hathaway bought shaCMon-5/26/1999
2548 mw - The only 13F for Berkshire that I could find was at: edgar-online.com aDavid Penfield-5/26/1999
2547 David; so your point is ??? Are you saying Berkshire Hathaway didn't by sMW-5/26/1999
2546 <i>As of 3/99 Berkshire Hathaway has accumulated 106,800 shares of yours David Penfield-5/26/1999
2545 those of us who are long...Al's Fun-5/25/1999
2544 good morning kev <<It seems most of this deal is not "clear" MW-5/25/1999
2543 "our stock?" who's we? Sir Auric Goldfinger-5/25/1999
2542 <I>It seems most of this deal is not "clear" to you. I wonder tKevin Podsiadlik-5/25/1999
2541 sorry augie; no link but I can fax it to you <<I think I'm having aMW-5/24/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News