SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
InfoSpace.com
An SI Board Since December 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3070 69 0 INSP
Emcee:  Goldbug Guru Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2570My remarks apply to both threads. My message was posted here because I found thsilversoldier a/k/a SI Sy-2/20/2001
2569Sy, I think you're talking about the integrity of the GNET thread. And now Dan Hamilton-2/20/2001
2568JB, you cantankerous (not so old) Curmudgeon, I believe it is time we former GNEsilversoldier a/k/a SI Sy-2/20/2001
2567What is the difference between biased opinions and viewing a company in light oftrouthead-2/20/2001
2566Well Naveen did state in his conference call that he was going to redefine the elizking-2/20/2001
2565Now come on, lose the sarcasm ....... i never said I like Naveen and his Public lizking-2/20/2001
2564Another fact: Someone here related that NJ gave all remaining employees stock opmikiespeedracer-2/20/2001
2563Finally, we agree! I hope you understand that some of the "bias" comemikiespeedracer-2/20/2001
2562Well its nice to see the stock holding its ground at 3.53 for the second tradinglizking-2/20/2001
2561Absolutely.Carolyn-2/20/2001
2560Well sorry it appeared that way just think it would be better served to look at lizking-2/20/2001
2559Your remark to mikiespeedracer indicates otherwise. Many people post on both thCarolyn-2/20/2001
2558Who said who controls anything..... I choose to post here and not on the GO2NETlizking-2/20/2001
2557Thank you for the additional take on this topic.... That is helpful informationlizking-2/20/2001
2556Since when do <i>you</i> control this non-moderated thread?Carolyn-2/20/2001
2555Here's the full article text....... F U T U R E B O Y The Vacuum at Inflizking-2/20/2001
2554thestandard.com Here you go Hot Shot!!! You want facts... Looks like we joinemikiespeedracer-2/20/2001
2553I found the article you had linked. It was published January 26. The one I linDan Hamilton-2/20/2001
2552Weird; I couldn't get that link to work. So I did a search on INSP and cameDan Hamilton-2/20/2001
2551Your telling me not to be judgemental... You said please don't believe Navelizking-2/20/2001
2550Just curious liz, did you read the Standard article?? BTW -- I will post where mikiespeedracer-2/20/2001
2549This is an infospace board...... so if you are going to give an unbiased opinionlizking-2/20/2001
2548Please don't believe NJ's excuses as to why the management left. The Stmikiespeedracer-2/20/2001
2547Wow here's an interesting article it says that Horowitz was going to leave blizking-2/20/2001
2546INSP appears to be betting on iTV as well as wireless. Look at the sales projecDan Hamilton-2/20/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News