SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
(LVLT) - Level 3 Communications
An SI Board Since January 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3873 119 0 LVLT
Emcee:  MangoBoy Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2573Frank, it's a mystery to me. I think that we're seeing a gross over-reaSecularBull-11/3/2000
2572Dear LoF - or anybody else - can somebody please explain to me the slide of thisFrank Wechsler-11/3/2000
2571Your proving your incompetence for us. You're banking on a WSJ story to makSecularBull-11/3/2000
2570re: "pretend that LVLT's continually delaying completion dates" SecularBull-11/3/2000
2569What was that about grass? Did someone say "grass"? I'm not up fSecularBull-11/3/2000
2568If that is true, why do you feel the need to post on this thread? LoFSecularBull-11/3/2000
2567??? Is Jill such a rare name you assume all Jills are Jill Munden? You don'Jill-11/3/2000
2566What wld U call LVLT's 70ish% plunge from $130ish to $41ish if that isn'IngotWeTrust-11/3/2000
2565Re: massive hemmorhage of equity shareholder value, that is really disingenuous:Jill-11/3/2000
2564Nope, Jill, I have no mandate to enlighten the masses, just curious about an outIngotWeTrust-11/2/2000
2563So what are you doing here? Enlightening the masses?Jill-11/2/2000
2562Nope, never said I was an authority...just have the ability to read and observe IngotWeTrust-11/2/2000
2561Huh? Another peron who needs to email the WSJ Staff Writer you are claiming mIngotWeTrust-11/2/2000
2560He's not squirming. He corrected the misinformation and you made light of yJill-11/2/2000
2559"Infantile and non-productive"? Coming from you?! Give me a break! SecularBull-11/2/2000
2558Your personal attack of me=infantile & non-productive. If you want specificIngotWeTrust-11/2/2000
2557<i>You, who claim not to be full of baloney and to represent Level Three, Cliff Daniel-11/2/2000
2556If there was some discrepancy regarding the company's position on when the USecularBull-11/2/2000
2555Thanks LOF... I consider the matter closed. Water over the dam either way. Jueeziee-11/2/2000
2554Perhaps this will help set the record straight: Omaha, NE, May 4, 1998 - Level SecularBull-11/2/2000
2553Cliff.... I was asked for a url. I provided one. THE INTRO TO THIS DISCUSSIONeeziee-11/2/2000
2552I expected as much. Can't say that I was surprised that you couldn't deSecularBull-11/2/2000
2551<font color=orange>WHOA, LoF! Don't even go there! <b>YOU ASKEIngotWeTrust-11/2/2000
2550I see the WSJ as the source there, honker. Show me where LVLT said that. LoFSecularBull-11/2/2000
2549<i>FAIR USE, etc:</i><font color=red> "Ex-MFS Managers PlIngotWeTrust-11/2/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News