SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Techniclone (TCLN)
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3702 23 0 TCLN
Emcee:  cjgaddy Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2577 John Dixon, before I give you my guarantee, I need to confirm that, in fact, IPDavid-9/24/1998
2576 THIS POST IS FROM "irhelper" ON YAHOO . . . POSTED AT HIS REQUEST - D Mack-9/23/1998
2575 This company troubles me-- seems to have very sound science with good clinical Michael Cash-9/23/1998
2574 So Clinton gets caught, and his response is "let me focus on doing my jobJim Baker-9/23/1998
2573 And you are right. The frustration (emotion) that comes from having to acceJim Baker-9/23/1998
2572 Yeah Alys, you're tracking with me. That's the question. I hope DaviJim Baker-9/23/1998
2571 I am so relieved to see that all of you are still here. From the lack of responAlys Hall-9/23/1998
2570 Hey Davis, I know you like a few challenging questions from time to time, so hJim Baker-9/23/1998
2569 Correct me if I'm wrong.....The shares are already authorized, not new sharTerry D.-9/23/1998
2568 Sometimes emotions prevail over reason. Sometimes they lead to even greaterJim Baker-9/23/1998
2567 I have to concur with PDavid on this one. This management has made absoluteJim Baker-9/23/1998
2566 Phil, I have a little over $142,000.00 tied up in this company. I gladly acceptjohn dixon-9/23/1998
2565 Phil, everyone is entitled to their own opinion...good for you. You think manaEZLibra-9/23/1998
2564 Davis, with respect, I would like to know why this answer is the only way to goPDavid-9/23/1998
2563 Just thought I would copy the only common sense answer to proposition #2 in theEZLibra-9/23/1998
2562 Davis et al....Just finished reading the following: biz.yahoo.com and I would Alys Hall-9/22/1998
2561 Morning John. I don't think any words are needed now, most everything has bEZLibra-9/21/1998
2560 Maurice...Thank you for taking the time to respond to my post. I know that you Alys Hall-9/21/1998
2559 "I think the second or third time around doing reverse splits is enough toMaurice Winn-9/19/1998
2558 OK Davis, its time for some of your positive comments. The crowd over at Yahoo john dixon-9/19/1998
2557 A few odd things happened at end of day: Little volume (in dollar terms, realJim Baker-9/15/1998
2556 Amen! It's interesting that at the end of the day the stock went up, not dshero-9/15/1998
2555 Hey guys...what is this tug of war over reverse splits? The Companies I have knAlys Hall-9/15/1998
2554 Wow Phil, you are in a state and getting a bit personal! Not to worry, with TCMaurice Winn-9/15/1998
2553 This appears to be the technical "break-out" we have all being lookinrichard badauskas-9/15/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):