SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Wallendas!
An SI Board Since July 2004
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
51 6 0
Emcee:  Lazarus_Long Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
26!CIXELSYD SI JROJ !CIXELSYD SI JROJ !CIXELSYD SI JROJLazarus_Long-7/27/2004
25wonder if the reverse spelling would get me banned...hmmmmJorj X Mckie-7/27/2004
24watch it fella if you keep this up you'll be sent over to dictionaryRainy_Day_Woman-7/27/2004
23Watch that, buddy! There are limits!Lazarus_Long-7/27/2004
22<b>!!!!SADNELLAWJorj X Mckie-7/27/2004
21<font color=blue><font size=15> WALLENDAS!Rainy_Day_Woman-7/27/2004
20feels good doesn't it? inner sanctum, where you can shout Wallendas at the Rainy_Day_Woman-7/27/2004
19Wall-effen-endasJorj X Mckie-7/27/2004
18<b>Wallendas</b> just testing the watersRainy_Day_Woman-7/27/2004
17I think you're banned and you didn't even say Wallendas [maybe it ws Rainy_Day_Woman-7/27/2004
16well, it isn't exactly like redfish made the threat to put a ski up my ass. Jorj X Mckie-7/27/2004
15Redfish previously challenged Gloop to a fist fight (or vice versa I don't rmph-7/27/2004
14Is that redfish you speak of? Can't be. AS assures me only Republicans do Lazarus_Long-7/26/2004
13not familiar with redfish's posts until today. at least siouxie has his oJorj X Mckie-7/26/2004
12Done. And PMed notice to him. That boy Sioux has more than one screw loose, yoLazarus_Long-7/26/2004
11Hey Redfish! why is siouxpal suggesting that you perform an act of phsyical vioJorj X Mckie-7/26/2004
10dood, unban redfish. I want him to respond to something.Jorj X Mckie-7/26/2004
9Hmmm. Try posting again.Lazarus_Long-7/26/2004
8Yeah but all the people who got banned are pricks, so it doesn't count.redfish-7/26/2004
7That is merely a subsidiary of the the Professional Amalgamation of Wallendas (PLazarus_Long-7/26/2004
6Let's not forget the Consolidated Hamstrung Aggregation of Wallendas ("Alan Smithee-7/26/2004
5follow the flying links Message 19997696MulhollandDrive-7/26/2004
4On Monday, Apr 12, 2004 at 1:11 PM, RDW posted "Wallendas!" on ChrisJLazarus_Long-7/26/2004
3HE WOULDN'T DARE! We will sic the General National Association of WallendasLazarus_Long-7/26/2004
2S M I L E think SI Dave will shut down this thread?Rainy_Day_Woman-7/26/2004
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):