SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
The Residential Real Estate Crash Index
An SI Board Since June 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
306849 644 0 $HGX
Emcee:  patron_anejo_por_favor Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromPosted
260914I haven't been duped. Its a democracy in the broader sense of the word. A trtejek7/14/2010
260913You're sued or prosecuted if you break Federal immigration law, or if you imElroy Jetson7/14/2010
260912Time Travel for Pension Costs: How It's Done huffingtonpost.com We are juLes H7/14/2010
260911The lesson? Do not be shy about demanding oral gratification from people hittinTravis_Bickle7/14/2010
260910i'm terrified that so many people have been duped into thinking our constituSkeeter Bug7/14/2010
260909Who's starting that 3rd party? You? I don't see one..bentway7/14/2010
260908Ten year is looking interesting on an "UP" Dow day. Of course I'mTH7/14/2010
260907Obama Justice Dept. announces it will not sue sanctuary cities. So if I have thjoseffy7/14/2010
260906You keep spreading this disinformation, but the work done and in the pipe is outbentway7/14/2010
260905and pigs fly. i've show you graphs of the fed's own data showing outstaSkeeter Bug7/14/2010
260904i get you - and you are right... to a point. it has already started... <b&gSkeeter Bug7/14/2010
260903"I trust that boomers won't "whine like a bunch of babies" whbentway7/14/2010
260902"I will point out that there was a brief moment in time when the Dems had abentway7/14/2010
260901Sign of the Times: Even Cravath Has to Sell Itself _____________________________stockman_scott7/14/2010
260900<i>credit is CONTRACTING in the economy as WHOLE.</I> No, it is nottejek7/14/2010
260899The woman who ran against him ran a very bad compaign. I will be surprised if Brtejek7/14/2010
260898<i>For the most part, the fed. gov't has stopped taking a proactive sttejek7/14/2010
260897Thanks.tejek7/14/2010
260896OK. Thanks.tejek7/14/2010
260895This is another example of GOP incompetence. Bobbie jindal of LA complained and tejek7/14/2010
260894This is typical of what the Senate Dems are facing. Massachusetts voters are inctejek7/14/2010
260893No...the guys who ran TV ads during the peak of the real estate bubble chiding tpatron_anejo_por_favor7/14/2010
260892ditech.comBonefish7/14/2010
260891You can't argue with the TARP and stimulus people because they pull out the Broken_Clock7/14/2010
260890<i>Ditech owns GMAC, they were spun off right before O bailed out GM. Withtejek7/14/2010
260889Bravo.Bonefish7/14/2010
260888<i>However, what I never expected was for Obama to engage in a socializatitejek7/14/2010
260887>>What does Ditech have to do with GM?<< Ditech owns GMAC, they werpatron_anejo_por_favor7/14/2010
260886sounds like you're old enuf to remember bias ply tires... a lot of baby booLazarus7/14/2010
260885Probably the same bunch that camped out overnight to get their money down on eveBonefish7/14/2010
260884<i>Let's flip your outrage over. The question I'm asking is why artejek7/14/2010
260883'i have a SERIOUS PROBLEM , i remember every post i read or write---evidentlBonefish7/14/2010
260882mm, those 5 people still owe more money than exists. why? well, their money suSkeeter Bug7/14/2010
260881LOLRetiredNow7/14/2010
260880Well, what shocked me about Obama's socialism is that I fully expected him tRetiredNow7/14/2010
260879Thanks for rubbing it in....now the red and gold looks even uglier. ;-) <i&gtejek7/14/2010
260878LOL. Well, I recently paid off my house. I've been sitting here with my retiRetiredNow7/14/2010
260877<i>I've posted the same thing. In a past post, I said that it's notejek7/14/2010
260876I've posted the same thing. In a past post, I said that it's now typicalRetiredNow7/14/2010
260875<i>A big thank you. :) I actually want to be wrong. If you are right, thentejek7/14/2010
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):